RMI4020CBE Risk Management Deliverable 7 PowerPoint Presentation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
DELIVERABLE 7 – SENIOR RISK ANALYST PRESENTATION
Competencies
- Construct a framework for identifying, evaluating, and categorizing risk and risk management tools.
- Appraise the relationship between a heightened regulatory environment and corporate governance.
- Evaluate the components of operational risk and the application of corresponding risk management plans.
- Evaluate the principles of risk and reward in the investment sector and its applications to the broader area of risk management.
Scenario
undefined
LTD is headquartered in Houston, TX. LTD does not sell insurance directly to the public. Instead, it uses third-party agents to sell its policies. LTD handles all customer service needs including claims intake, policy services, and general questions. The company operates in four states: California, Texas, Louisiana, and Florida. Currently, LTD does not have an active system in place to ensure that its agents are in fact using LTD guidelines to screen potential policyholders. However, no evidence of negligence has emerged so far as the organization has yet to have a year in which it was not profitable. LTD has also had the good fortune of not suffering losses because of natural disasters or catastrophic events.
Instructions
You have been hired for the role of Senior Risk Analyst. This means that you are responsible for overseeing and managing the organization’s all risk management activities. Before you can design a plan to manage risks, your first task is to identify the primary risk exposures the organization should acknowledge. The organization is also concerned about threats to its operational efficacy. Therefore, you need to also identify operational risk exposures and explain why operational losses must be categorized. The board is also seeking your input on the relationship between risk and reward and how it pertains to the company’s investment portfolio. Your supervisor has asked you to create a PowerPoint presentation of your report. Remember your audience when crafting your presentation, and include the following slides:
- Title slide
- Evaluate the significance of identifying risks and address the ramifications of failing to do so.
- Identify two insurance regulations and analyze their roles in managing risks within the insurance industry.
- Identify the market, business, and compliance risks LTD encounters.
- Explain why the operational losses cannot be broadly managed. Why do they have to be categorized?
- Examine the relationship between risk and reward and how it pertains to investing.
- Explain why effective financial management correlates with risk management.
- Your conclusion slide should include at least three risk management activities relevant to insurance (and your rationale for choosing them specifically) and how they link to enhanced organizational effectiveness.
Grading Rubric
F F C B A 0 1 2 3 4 Not Submitted No Pass Competence Proficiency Mastery Not Submitted At least one slide requirement is missing. All required slides are included. All required slides are included, along with any supporting explanations or examples. All required slides are included, along with any supporting explanations or examples and are professionally presented. Not Submitted Inaccurate discussion on the importance of identifying risks is included OR no discussion on the importance of identifying risks is included OR appropriate consequences of failing to identify risks are not included. Accurate discussion on the importance of identifying risks is included AND appropriate consequences of failing to identify each risk mentioned are included. Accurate discussion that utilizes specific examples of the importance of identifying risks is included AND appropriate consequences of failing to identify each risk mentioned are included. Thorough and accurate discussion that utilizes specific examples of the importance of identifying risks is included AND appropriate consequences of failing to identify each risk mentioned are fully explained. Not Submitted Less than two insurance regulations are accurately analyzed in their role in managing risk in the insurance industry. Two insurance regulations (laws or acts) are accurately analyzed in their role in managing risk in the insurance industry. Two insurance regulations (laws or acts) are thoroughly and accurately analyzed in their role in managing risk in the insurance industry. More than two insurance regulations (laws or acts) are thoroughly and accurately analyzed in their role in managing risk in the insurance industry. Not Submitted No valid risks are identified for at least one area (market, compliance, and business). At least one valid risk relevant to LTD is identified for each area (market, compliance, and business). At least one valid risk relevant to LTD is identified and explained for each area (market, compliance, and business). More than one valid risk relevant to LTD is identified and explained for each area (market, compliance, and business). Not Submitted Inaccurate discussion of why operational losses must be categorized is included OR no discussion of why operational losses must be categorized is included. Accurate discussion of why operational losses must be categorized is included. Accurate explanation that utilizes specific examples of why operational losses must be categorized is included. Thorough and accurate explanations that utilize specific examples of why operational losses must be categorized are included. Not Submitted Inaccurate discussion of how the relationship between risk and reward relates to investing is included OR no discussion of how the relationship between risk and reward relates to investing is included. Accurate discussion of how the relationship between risk and reward relates to investing. Accurate explanation that utilizes specific examples of how the relationship between risk and reward relates to investing. Thorough and accurate explanations that utilize specific examples of how the relationship between risk and reward relates to investing Not Submitted Inaccurate discussion that utilizes specific examples to explain how effective financial management correlates with risk management OR no discussion to explain how effective financial management correlates with risk management. Accurate discussion of how effective financial management correlates with risk management. Accurate explanation that utilizes specific examples to examine how effective financial management correlates with risk management. Thorough and accurate explanations that utilize specific examples to examine how effective financial management correlates with risk management. Not Submitted Conclusion slide(s) does not summarize at least three pertinent risk management activities OR does not describe how at least one affects organizational effectiveness. Conclusion slide(s) summarizes at least three pertinent risk management activities AND describes how each affects organizational effectiveness. Includes rationale for selection. Conclusion slide(s) thoroughly summarizes the details of at least three pertinent risk management activities AND explains how each affects organizational effectiveness. Includes rationale for selection. Conclusion slide(s) thoroughly summarizes the details of more than three pertinent risk management activities AND provides deep and meaningful insight on how each affects organizational effectiveness. Includes rationale for selection
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!