Risk Categories and Examples
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Risk Categories and Examples
- a) Schedule Risks:
Example 1: Resource Delays – This risk occurs when key team members, such as developers or subject matter experts, are not available as planned due to unexpected circumstances like illness or other project commitments. This can lead to delays in project tasks.
Example 2: Technical Challenges – Technical issues, such as software bugs or hardware malfunctions, can impact the project schedule. For instance, in a software development project, a critical bug could require additional time for debugging and fixing.
- b) Cost Risks:
Example 1: Budget Overrun – Unforeseen expenses, like scope changes or unexpected resource requirements, can lead to a budget overrun. This risk may occur when project managers do not adequately account for potential changes or contingencies.
Example 2: Currency Exchange Fluctuations – In international projects, changes in exchange rates can affect the cost of resources, materials, or services. A sudden devaluation of a currency can increase project costs.
- c) Quality Risks:
Example 1: Inadequate Testing – Skipping or insufficient testing can result in the release of a product or service with quality issues, leading to customer dissatisfaction and potential rework. For instance, a software product with limited testing may have numerous defects.
Example 2: Scope Creep – When project scope continually expands without proper change control, it can compromise the quality of deliverables. Project teams may rush to complete additional work, potentially sacrificing quality to meet deadlines.
Categorizing risks is crucial for several reasons. It helps in:
Risk Identification: Categorization makes it easier to identify potential risks in different aspects of a project, ensuring that no critical risk goes unnoticed.
Risk Assessment: It allows project teams to prioritize risks based on their categories and potential impact, aiding in the allocation of resources for risk management.
Resource Allocation: It helps allocate resources, budget, and time to address specific types of risks appropriately.
Communication: Categories simplify communication about risks among team members, stakeholders, and decision-makers, enhancing overall project understanding.
- Project Risk Register:
Creating and maintaining a project risk register is a critical component of effective risk management. My approach includes:
Identification: Initially, engage stakeholders, project team members, and subject matter experts to identify potential risks. Document these risks in the register.
Assessment: Evaluate the identified risks in terms of their probability, impact, and urgency. This assessment helps prioritize risks.
Mitigation and Response Planning: Develop mitigation strategies and contingency plans for high-priority risks. Assign responsible individuals and timelines for implementing these plans.
Monitoring and Updates: Continuously monitor the status of identified risks and update the risk register as new risks emerge or existing risks evolve. Regularly review and revise mitigation and response strategies.
Stakeholder Engagement: Actively involve stakeholders in the risk management process, including risk identification and response planning. Stakeholder input can provide diverse perspectives and valuable insights.
Communication: Communicate the contents of the risk register to the project team and relevant stakeholders. Ensure that everyone understands the identified risks, their potential impact, and the actions taken to address them.
A well-maintained risk register is critical for keeping a project on track. It serves as a proactive tool for risk management, enabling teams to anticipate potential issues and take timely actions to mitigate or respond to risks.
- Probability and Impact Matrix:
The Probability and Impact Matrix is a tool used to assess the likelihood and severity of risks. It classifies risks into categories based on their probability of occurrence and the potential impact on the project. In real life, this matrix is invaluable for prioritizing risks and determining where to focus risk management efforts.
High Probability, High Impact (Red Zone): Risks in this category are of utmost concern. They have a high likelihood of occurring and can cause severe consequences. Immediate and extensive mitigation is necessary.
High Probability, Low Impact (Yellow Zone): Risks in this category have a high likelihood but lower impact. While they may not lead to catastrophic outcomes, they should still be closely monitored and mitigated.
Low Probability, High Impact (Orange Zone): These risks have a lower likelihood of occurrence but can have significant consequences if they do. Special attention and contingency plans are needed for such risks.
Low Probability, Low Impact (Green Zone): Risks in this category have a low likelihood of occurring, and if they do, the impact is minor. They may be monitored but may not require extensive mitigation efforts.
Using this matrix, project managers can make informed decisions about where to allocate resources and effort for risk management. High-impact, high-probability risks receive the most attention, while low-impact, low-probability risks may only require monitoring. It is a practical and visual way to prioritize and address risks effectively.
In conclusion, risk management, including categorization, maintaining a risk register, and using tools like the Probability and Impact Matrix, is fundamental to ensuring project success and minimizing unexpected disruptions. Engaging stakeholders in this process enhances the quality of risk assessments and response planning.
Risk Categories and Examples
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!