revolution of self-care essay assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
revolution of self-care essay assignment
How well did they explain the problem / need / opportunity they are looking to solve?
They explained the problem decently well and described the need for a blood pressure indicator. They also highlighted how the need for a third party system would be beneficial.
They also metioned how the obesity crisis is increasing the need for such a device.
2) Solution: How well did they explain their idea for a solution to this problem or need?
They explained the idea decently well, the only part I am not getting is how they plan on designing the blood pressure indicator. He focuses on how its third party system will alert others but he has not made it clear if he plans on building his own indicator or just acquiring someone else’s design.
3) Value: What forms of value is (can be) delivered by the idea? Make sure to dig deeper to explore all the types of value they may be creating with the idea. Are there some subtle forms of value that might be extra important but were not emphasized enough?
On the surface, they have created value by creating a novel third party system for blood pressure indicators to help the elderly and children stay safe. By doing so, they have also solidified thee need for a blood pressure indicator, and provided comfort and security to loved ones. With this device, he has helped boost the awareness of high blood pressure and allowed emergency providers a step ahead in treating a possible catastrophic medical incident.
4) Strengths: What are the strengths of the idea? What do you like about the concept? What does it do that makes it good? Why might people like it? In what situations or contexts might it be or work best?
It addresses the sense of security people want to have and follows along the growing individual health devices that are popping up on the market. It is incorporating technology with existing systems to make a more user friendly and useful device that feels more integrated into the real world.
5) Uniqueness: What makes this concept different from what exists? What are the unusual aspects of this concept? What does this concept have that no others have? What competitors or alternatives offer similar value? How well did they explain / explore this?
It is different because it alerts third party individuals if a blood pressure reading is too high or too low. It provides that extra sense of security by giving loved ones the alert text. If part of his idea is to create a blood pressure indicator than it is very similar to the competition. I feel like apple probably has apps that can do a similar thing as this. All it would require is using already existing devices and a single app that sends a message to a specific contact list.
6) Weaknesses: What problems do you see with the concept? Where is the concept weakest? What problems will other people notice in the concept? What technical challenges might this concept have? What business challenges might this concept have?
The concept is weakest when you consider how there are already so many blood pressure indictors who do nearly the same thing minus the third party idea. In that case the idea of a blood pressure indictor is not novel and only the third party alert is novel.
7) Unknowns / Assumptions: What unanswered questions or untested assumptions did you notice? What can they do to test or validate these assumptions (e.g., experiments)?
They could test these assumptions by determining how well apple watches and other similar blood pressure reading devices have worked and do mock trials with consumers. They could pair their third party idea
Advice From another Person: COLLAPSE
Top of Form
This product can be essential towards the revolution of self-care. There is a generational issue of high blood pressure that runs throughout my family. My aunt, my mother, and the children of my mother are the only individuals who have not procured this attribute. My concerns are cost and availability. Will this product be recommended or required to be prescribed by a cardiologist/primary cared doctor? Will this product be sold over the counter? What will the cost of the product be? If the cost is exorbitant, can it be off set by an individual’s medical insurance since it is a product that utilizes medical technology?
Bottom of Form
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!