Response to the Character Traits and Skills Discussion Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
David No. 1
What qualities do you believe it needs to be a high-quality Disaster Mental Health Responder?
What kind of personality traits and talents do you think you’ll need?
When I do a self-assessment, the first image that comes to mind is of a person who is better at listening than talking. When this individual speaks, they avoid giving counsel or telling a different story of pain. The DMH responder’s ideal character attributes are comparable, if not identical, to those of all disaster responders: calm under pressure, flexibility, a skilled communicator, and experience-based knowledge (King et al., 2016). I assume that these skills are accompanied by additional characteristics such as a low ego and an ability to empathize easily.
The individual who excels in the job of DMH responder is likely dependable, follow through on their promises, and is willing to share with clearly stated boundaries on what is too personal. Patton, Smith, and Lilienfield (2017) published a study that reveals first responders had more character traits that overlap with psychopathy than the general public. First responders show a level of disinhibition and aggressiveness in putting themselves in a high-risk position, but clearly with the objective of prosocial results rather than psychopaths’ antisocial ends (Patton et al., 2017).
What kinds of personality qualities, if any, and even skill sets, can make it difficult to be effective?
I feel a lack of self-awareness would be a significant impediment for a DMH responder. As far as I can tell, the lack of introspection has two effects, the first of which distorts your view of your effectiveness. Survivors of Katrina and September 11th were questioned by Siems (2016), who discovered that those who felt themselves an authority, or someone who guided other people during the disaster, performed well on a test meant to identify persons who overestimate their abilities.
The second difficulty is that you, as a DMH responder, are just as prone to negative stimuli as anyone else. The macro-level of a disaster’s total aftermath, as well as the micro-level of seeking to create a therapeutic relationship with people under distress, are all stressors. Contact with survivors might make disaster responders feel distressed (Halpern & Tramontin, 2007). When compared to the overall population in the United States, first responders have a greater risk of depression and PTSD (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMSHA], 2018). Police, fire, and EMS are considered first responders by SAMSHA, but the military is not included (2018).
Consider what you would do if you were in this position. What characteristics or skills do you believe you have that might be useful in this situation? Or, what role do you think you’d be more suited for? Do you think there would be any areas of that role that would be particularly tough for you?
Working as a DMH responder would be a challenging experience for me. An ED RN’s reputation for being light and quick on their feet is well-deserved. In the event of a disaster, I would choose direct medical care above mental therapy. Internally, if I had things to do instead of listening, I would feel more valuable. I also believe I would have a hard time resisting the need to medicalize or explain away someone’s pain in some way.My lack of experience working in a declared disaster would be the most difficult component of the job for me. I find it amusing to type that out because I worked and lived through Superstorm Sandy, but I just see it as an inconvenience. I’ve got the fear that I “don’t know what I don’t know” as a result of my reading, which puts me at risk of exaggerating my abilities.
The overall picture, in my opinion, mirrors Pfefferbaum et al. (2012), Halpern and Tramontin (2007), and SAMHSA (2018) in that the function of the DMH responder should be present at all levels of disaster response, regardless of whether the organization is local, state, federal, public, or private.
J. Halpern and M. Tramontin (2007). Theory and practice of disaster mental health. Thomson Brooke/Cole, Belmont, CA.
R. V. King, G. L. Larkin, R. L. Fowler, D. L. Downs, and C. S. North (2016). A survey of disaster medical practitioners revealed the characteristics of competent disaster responders and leaders. 720723 in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2016.24
C. L. Patton, S. F. Smith, and S. O. Lilienfeld (2017). Psychopathy and heroism in first responders: Are They the Same Characteristics? Theory, Research, and Treatment of Personality Disorders http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/per0000261
B. Pfefferbaum, B. W. Flynn, D. Schonfeld, L. M. Brown, G. A. Jacobs, D. Dodgen, D. Donato, D. Kaul, R. E. Stone, B., Norwood, A. E., Reissman, D. B., Herrmann, J., Hobfoll, S. E., Jones, R. T., Ruzek, J. I., Ursan (2012). Mental and behavioral health are being integrated into catastrophe preparedness, response, and recovery. 6066 in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 10.1001/dmp.2012.1 https://doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2012.1 (Links to an external site.)
J. W. Siems, J. W. Siems, J. W. Siems (2016). The Dunning-Kruger effect and disaster threat (master’s thesis). The information was retrieved from the Homeland Security Library Database. (798825)
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) is a federal agency that deals with substance abuse and mental (2018). Behavioral health issues, emergency response, and trauma for first responders [Supplementary Information]. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/dtac/supplementalresearchbulletin-firstresponders-may2018.pdf (This is a link to another website.)
Wael is number two.
Responders and survivors of catastrophes can receive stress management, substance abuse treatment, and mental health services such as therapy and counseling through disaster mental health. Effective disaster mental health responders are specialists who can provide such services by guiding and supporting survivors emotionally (Halpern & Vermeulen, 2017). As a result, the expert should validate the survivors’ coping abilities and health before proceeding. As a result, survivors are seen as capable individuals who can realign their lives with the support of respect, understanding, and compassion.
the first question
The skills and information acquired during catastrophe training are not the only qualities required of disaster responders. Catastrophe/command knowledge, on the other hand, is critical for ensuring flexibility and adaptability in a variety of disaster circumstances. It is critical to have the proper training to respond to a sudden disaster since it ensures immediate assistance and response without panic. It also aids individuals in remaining cool, calm, and collected under duress, making it easier to assist the survivors. Because diverse obstacles arise when assisting survivors, decision-making and problem-solving skills are highly essential (Halpern & Vermeulen, 2017). Others may be severely traumatized, therefore responders must be able to make quick decisions and address problems before the situation gets out of hand.
Furthermore, excellent communication skills are required to assist responders and survivors in effectively communicating during treatment, counseling, or casual discussions. This aids in the development of a deeper understanding of the individual and situation, making it easier to administer the most appropriate treatment. Last but not least, personal character is critical since it reflects attitudes toward problems and activities. As a result, having a positive personality can help you accomplish greater goals and assist disaster survivors.
2nd question
There are some negative abilities and personality qualities that can make catastrophe response more difficult. For starters, a pessimistic mindset can lead to frustration and failure (King et al., 2019). When working with survivors, it’s easy to spot negative energy, which prevents them from opening up and accepting the help they need. Fear and a lack of self-control are also negative attributes that can lead to anxiety, which can stymie achievement and limit the goals and objectives set. It’s difficult to do anything when responders are terrified when confronted with a disaster situation. Finally, because disaster response abilities such as communication, teamwork, and problem-solving are highly necessary when reacting to situations, a lack of effective disaster response skills may stymie success.
Question three
Because of my ability to work under pressure, make smart decisions, and operate as part of a team, I would be useful as a disaster mental health responder. Collaboration is beneficial to success since diverse people have different perspectives that might be useful in disasters. Teamwork also promotes learning and creativity, as well as bringing together complementary skills, building trust, and encouraging healthy risk-taking (King et al., 2019). However, the most difficult component of this duty for me would be remaining fearless and bold enough to assist survivors. I am readily moved by seeing people suffer, and the situation may be emotional, making it difficult to provide good assistance to the survivors. As a result, I’d need extra catastrophe training to help me face any scenario with confidence and fearlessness. I’m not surprised by any of my classmates’ reactions because most of them are aware of disaster response needs as well as the necessary abilities and qualities to deal with such situations. Furthermore, all of the aforementioned character characteristics and skills are absolutely vital and required for this role.
References
J. Halpern and K. Vermeulen (2017). Principles and procedures for disaster mental health interventions. Taylor and Francis is a publishing house based in the United Kingdom.
R. V. King, G. L. Larkin, K. R. Klein, R. L. Fowler, D. L. Downs, and C. S. North (2019). The qualities of effective catastrophe responders and leaders are ranked. 700-703 in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.
Mike is number three.
The perfect Mental Health Disaster Recovery res
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!