Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
7th edition of APA format. 1 paragraph with scholar authors only . 2 Reference need to be include.
Discussion 1:
My key intervention is having psychology group round with the critical care physicians. This would be the main intervention that would potentially cascade into other positive changes in the critical care setting. It has been well documented that patients in the ICU experience prolonged mental health problems, including cognitive deficits and distress (Hosey, et al., 2019). If referrals to psychology happen early then they can start therapies before discharge and be referred to continue therapy after discharge. Hosey, et al. studied referral types over a 10 month period at just one day a week in the critical care unit and found that they attended to a variety of psychological disorders. About one third of all referrals had a pre-existing mental health diagnosis (Hosey, et al., 2019). If continuing this trend, as the hospital in this study is similar to the hospital I work in, then we could potentially reduce stays of nearly one third of our patients if we referred early and often.
Often we do not think of psychology as a needed piece for health in critical care. We try to fix the acute health episode but forgo the mental health aspect of a critical care stay. Many studies are available on what benefits come from having a practitioner available but not many are done on actual practice in the ICU. Stucky, et al. surveyed a small group that have direct interaction in critical care and emergency settings and found many of those that worked full time in these settings considered themselves rehabilitation psychologists (2016). If we treated this as part of the recovery process then maybe we could lower the percentage of those with continuing mental health issues over a year after their stay. This could potentially contribute to increasing the number of people that are back to baseline and enjoy being part of their community.
Discussion 2:
The leading cause of injury among Americans 65 years old and older is falls (West, 2018). The injuries can be deadly or may cause injury to patient but not be life threatening. A fatal fall or a fall resulting in injury can be detrimental to patient’s health and financial situations. Multiple different interventions can be put into place to decrease the change of a patient falls. A nurse must do their part to implement these interventions and then the patient must be compliant.
If a nurse implements all necessary fall protocols but never educated the patient, what is the point. In an article in, Nursing 2020, one facility that worked to reduce falls noticed a discrepancy where 75% of patients that fell had fall risk interventions in place but fall risk education with patients was inconsistent (Gordon, 2018). Standardized communication should be used and provided to each patient. If patients are more aware of why they are at risk for falls and what interventions are being made to counteract each one of those risks, then patients will hopefully feel more responsible. Tailor interventions for patient safety or TIPS should be implemented (Dykes, 2017). These interventions should be specifically implemented so the appropriate interventions are put into place and the patient is made aware of those interventions.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!