Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Q1 Study Selection
Verloo et al. (2017) conducted a systematic literature search to assess nursing interventions to improve medication adherence among discharged older adults. With the help of a medical librarian, the team was able to find articles using predefined search terms, search themes and several mash terms to conduct a stringent criterion of the study with specific dates. Two members of the research team also did a search by hand of articles that were relevant but were unpublished. Any discrepancies among the authors they would bring everyone in and agree or disagree on the study. The selected studies included controlled clinical trials and randomized clinical trials to elevate the effects of the nursing interventions of patients who were 65 years or older. The takeaway from this is that the criteria and inclusion and exclusion matched the intended purpose of the study. The strengths were the collection of articles by using a skilled librarian and the two individual members finding articles that were unpublished. I believe the weaknesses of the study is that the population is too narrow to determine if the results represents the population.
References
Verloo, H., Chiolero, A., Kiszio, B., Kampel, T., & Santschi, V. (2017). Nurse interventions to improve medication adherence among discharged older adults: A systematic review. Age & Ageing, 46(5), 747–754. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx076
Please respond to this post either answering the post or creating new ideas.
Question 2: Risk of Bias and data Extraction
Strengths of Data Extraction
The researchers employed a standardized data extraction technique. Standardization is essential in the manipulation and transformation of data in a consistent manner. As such, the research articles used in the extraction of information contained author names, country, year of publication, participants’ characteristics, sample sizes, and follow-up durations. Standardization comes with several benefits. For instance, it enables the researcher to fish for more data that share the same concept that addresses the study problem. Nonetheless, it immensely reduces data variation that relates to the topic of concern. Through standardization, data extraction methods have been adopted to guide comparative and useful literature reviews.
Weaknesses of Data Extraction
Data extraction in this study is done separately. One major of this technique is that disagreements and conflicts often arise based on source findings. Such often complicate literature review and analysis processes. This is because irrelevant or inaccurate data is added to vital data, a barrier to accurate information. Errors that arise and are not corrected by researchers often lead the study astray, giving out misleading conclusions of reviews. Whenever such errors go, undetected invalidity is almost inevitable. That said, data extraction needs to be more precise. Data extraction techniques should give concrete in-depth evidence on related fields of study.
The Risk of Bias
Several factors increased the risk of biasness. One of such factors included the inability to conduct an official risk of bias assessment trial. The assessment test would have been performed using a checklist. The other factor that increased the risk of biasness was the lack of specific bias approaches for medical research. More so, false referencing formats used in the studies ascertains the risk of bias. Drawing conclusions to the research findings is unclear, therefore tricky.
Reference
Verloo, H., Chiolero, A., Kiszio, B., Kampel, T., & Santschi, V. (2017). Nurse interventions to improve medication adherence among discharged older adults: A systematic review. Age and Ageing, 46(5), 747-754. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx076
Please reply to this post either answering the post or creating new ideas.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!