Research Evaluation Form Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Research Evaluation Form Assignment
Research Evaluation Form CCMH/525 Version 3
5 University of Phoenix Material
Research Evaluation Form
Use this form for both your individual and Learning Team article reviews.
Name(s): ______________________________________________
Quantitative study: __________ Qualitative study: _____________
Location of Researcher’s Observation or Experiment
None _________ Home ________ Clinic _________ Lab __________
Residential facility _________ School _________ Hospital _________ Other __________
Were children involved? Yes _____ No ______ If your answer is yes, how many? _________
Introduction
Research hypothesis or research questions/problem behaviors: ________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Operational definitions:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following questions:
Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction?
_____________________________________________________________________________
Were the research questions and hypothesis clearly stated? Note that research questions are often presented implicitly within a description of the purpose of the study section.
Review of literature as relevant to the study: _________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Method
Sample size (total): ________________ Size per group or cell: _______________
Consider the following questions:
_______ Were the methods described so that the study could be replicated without further information?
Subjects
_______ Were subject recruitments and selection methods described?
_______ Were subjects randomly selected? Were there any biases in sampling?
_______ Were the samples appropriate for the population to which the researcher wished to generalize?
_______ Were characteristics of the sample adequately described?
_______ Are two or more groups being compared? Are they shown to be comparable on potentially confounding variables? If they are not comparable, is this incomparability handled properly?
_______ Was informed consent obtained?
_______ Was the size of the sample large enough for the number of measures and for the effect being sought?
Research Design
_______ Single group, time series study
_______ Multiple baseline (sequential) design: ______________
_______ Single group, no measurement
_______ Single group with measurement: Pre ______ During _____ Post _____
_______ Two groups classic experimental versus control group, randomly assigned
_______ (Quasi-experimental) two groups experimental versus control group,
not randomly assigned
_______ Correlation research, not manipulated, degree of relationship
_______ Descriptive research (qualitative study)
_______ Natural observation
_______ Analytical research
_______ Interview research
_______ Historical study
_______ Survey research
_______ Legal study
_______ Ethnography research
_______ Policy analysis
_______ Fieldwork research
_______ Evaluation study
_______ Phenomenology
_______ Grounded theory
_______ Protocol analysis (collection and analysis of verbatim reports)
_______ Case study, no measurement
_______ Case study, with measurement: Pre _________ During _______ Post _________
_______ Developmental research
_______ Longitudinal (same group of subjects over a period of time)
_______ Cross-sectional (subjects from different age groups compared)
_______ Cross-sequential (subjects from different age groups, shorter period of time)
_______ Correlation, more than two groups: control, treatment, and other treatment comparisons
_______ Factorial design, two or more groups: other treatment differences, no untreated controls
_______ Two or more dependent variables (MANOVA)
_______ Other design: __________________________________________________________
Consider the following Yes/No questions:
_______ If appropriate, was a control group used?
_______ Was the control method for the study appropriate?
_______ For what variable was being controlled?
_______ In the case of an experimental study, were subjects randomly assigned to groups?
Measures
Type of dependent measures or instruments used: ____________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Measurement or instrument validity information: _______________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Measurement or instrument reliability information: _____________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following Yes/No questions:
_______ For all measures—measures to classify subjects, dependent variables, and so forth—was evidence of reliability and validity provided, either through summarizing the data or by referring the reader to an available source for that information?
_______ Do the reliability and validity data justify the use of the measure? Specific evidence is particularly important if a measure is created just for this particular study.
_______ Do the measures match the researchers questions and hypothesis being addressed?
_______ In the case that different tasks or measures are used, was their order counterbalanced? Do the researchers analyze for potential order effects?
_______ Are multiple measures used, particularly those that sample the same domains or constructs but with different methods, such as self-report, rating scales, self-monitoring, or direct observation?
_______ If human observers, judges, or raters were involved, was inter-observer or inter-rater agreement (reliability) assessed? Was it obtained for a representative sample of the data? Did the two raters do their ratings independently? Was their reliability satisfactory?
Independent and Dependent Variables
Independent variables: ________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dependent variables: __________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Data Analysis
Scales of Measurement:
Nominal _______ Ordinal _______ Interval _______ Ratio _______
What type of statistical techniques are used?
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
What type of tables and graphs are used?
_____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following Yes/No questions:
_______ Do the data fulfill the assumptions and requirements of the statistics?
_______ Were tests of significance used and reported appropriately, such as with sufficient detail to understand what analysis was being conducted?
_______ In correlation studies, did the researchers interpret low but significant correlations as though they indicated a great deal of shared variance between the measures? Are the correlations limited by restricted ranges on one or more measures? Are means and standard deviations provided so that you may determine this?
_______ Do the researchers report means and standard deviations, if relevant, so that the reader can examine whether statistically significant differences are large enough to be meaningful?
Limitations of the study: ________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion
Summary and conclusions (usefulness): ____________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following Yes/No questions:
_______ Do the researchers discuss marginally or insignificant results as though they were significant?
_______Do the researchers over-interpret the data? For example, do they use casual language to integrate correlation findings or consider self-report of behavior to be equivalent to direct observation?
_______Do the researchers consider alternative explanations for the findings?
_______Do the researchers have a humility section that describes the limitations of the research?
_______Do the researchers point out aspects of subject selection, procedures, and dependent variables that limit generalizability of the findings?
Rate the writing style on a scale of 1 to 10:
Overall clarity? 1————-5————-10
Easy to read? 1————-5————-10
Organized? 1————-5————-10
Describe what you learned from the study:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________ ________________________________
Group member Group member
___________________________________ ________________________________
Group member Group member
___________________________________ ________________________________
Group member Group member
*Adapted from form created by Dr. Randy Buckner, University of Phoenix instructor
Copyright © 2017, 2015 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!