Relevance of The Theory in Criminology
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Relevance of The Theory in Criminology
Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 3 Points: 100 Overview: Throughout the course, you will be working on a criminal theories course project. For Part 3, you will discuss the purpose, main ideas, origins, and relevance of your first selected theory. Then you will apply the first theory you selected to the criminal act you chose in the Unit 2 outline. Instructions: In this assignment, you will:
- Select the first theory from the Unit 2 Outline: o Discuss the theory’s purpose and main idea. o Address the origin of the theory. o Cite the relevance of the theory in criminology from the Unit 2 Outline. o Apply the theory to the criminal act from the Unit 2 Outline.
Requirements:
- Submit in a Word document in APA format. • At least 2, but no more than three pages in length, not including title or reference
pages. • At least two resources outside of the textbook.
Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.
CRJ404 – Theoretical Criminology
Unit 3 Assignment: Course Project, Part 3
Evaluation Rubric for Unit 3 Assignment CRITERIA Deficient Needs
Improvement Proficient Exemplary
0-11 points 12-15 points 16-19 points 20 points Discuss the theory’s purpose and main idea
The theory’s purpose and main idea are missing or poorly written.
The theory’s purpose and main idea are presented but missing key details.
The theory’s purpose and main idea are presented but missing minor details.
The theory’s purpose and main idea are clearly and completely presented, including all details.
Address the origin of the theory
The origin is missing or poorly written.
The origin is presented but missing key details.
The origin is presented but missing minor details.
The origin is clearly and completely presented, including all details.
Cite the relevance of the theory in criminology
The relevance of the theory is missing or poorly written.
The relevance of the theory is presented but missing key details.
The relevance of the theory is presented but missing minor details.
The relevance of the theory is clearly and completely presented, including all details.
Apply the theory to the criminal act identified in the Unit 2 outline
The application to a criminal act is missing or poorly written.
The application to a criminal act is presented but missing key details.
The application to a criminal act is presented but missing minor details.
The application to a criminal act is clearly and completely presented including all details.
0 – 5 points 6 – 7 points 8 – 9 points 10 points
Resources Less than two resources.
Two resources. Three resources. More than three resources.
Clear and Professional Writing and APA Format
Errors impede professional presentation; guidelines are not followed.
Significant errors that do not impede professional presentation.
Few errors that do not impede professional presentation.
Writing and format are clear, professional, APA compliant, and error-free.
Overview:
Instructions:
Requirements:
Evaluation Rubric for Unit 3 Assignment
This discussion topic is designed to help you become familiar with how to annotate articles. In an annotation you will summarize the material in an article using your own words. In this discussion, you’ll read an academic article on teaching grammar and then write an annotation of that article.
Here’s how to get started:
Step 1: Watch the video, “How to Write an Annotated Bibliography-7th edition.” (It’s in this week’s Content.)
Step 2: Access and then read the article, “Teaching Grammar and Editing in Public Administration: Lessons Learned from Early Offerings of an Undergraduate Administrative Writing Course,” by Claire Connolly Knox.
This article is in the e-reserves section of your class. You can access the article by taking the following steps:
click Content select Class Resources select eReserves select the icon for eReserves in the middle of your page. in the list of items that appears, locate the article and download it Step 3: Create an annotation of this article as if you were considering it for a source in a paper. Here’s how:
List the article in APA format, as the video describes. (Note: the publication date for this article is not listed. A quick Google Search of the article title will show you that the year of publication is 2013. Include this in your citation.) Write a 150-200 word summary/critique of the article in which you not only summarize the article but also note any strengths or weaknesses you find in it. In addition, imagine a scholar who is writing about teaching grammar in writing courses–or that you are a scholar studying this topic. Would this be a possible article to consider for research on this topic? (Note: you won’t be writing about this topic for your own writing assignments.) Your annotation thus should include the following:
Focus of the study (~ 1-2 sentences Conclusion(s) of the study (~ 1-2 sentences) Analysis of the study (e.g., any strengths or weaknesses? Any thing that was particularly remarkable/helpful?) (~ 1-2 sentences) Its relevance to research on teaching grammar in writing courses (~ 1-2 sentences) Please refer to the “Sample Annotated Bibliography-7th edition” in this week’s Content for an example.
Step 4: Post your response.
Step 5: Comment on at least one of your classmates’ posts.
Please note: You’re not writing about teaching grammar for your own writing assignments. However, this exercise is designed to help you become familiar with listing a source in APA format and with writing a critical annotation for it.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!