Relationship To Generalist Practice Within This Community
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Relationship To Generalist Practice Within This Community
Community Event Discussion
In a casual context, answer each short-answer questions in this survey by writing your experience of the organizations who hosted the event you attended or for the social worker who works with them. Discuss the have lived experiences with implementing social change by including your debrief discussion with social workers/community workers directly. (e.g. attend community event, upload photo, debrief with social worker/community works through interview/discussion). When attending event, assess the organizations’ approach to implementing conducting meeting and approach to social change. You will also include reflective thoughts of your personal experience participating with the community directly
Question 1
Community event/civic engagement: Include the date, time, location of event. (Include photo or proof of attendance), if applicable.
Question 2
Define the community; Specifically identify the community population. Demographics of identified population (e.g age, race, ethnicity, gender, dress code, small/large group?) (100 words)
Question 3
Describe details of the interview/debrief, (who, what, where, when) of the personal or social worker you spoke with in an interview/debrief conversation, if applicable.
Question 4
Define macro practice and its relationship to generalist practice within this community; Possibly describe the historical context of macro practice in social work, if applicable. (150 words)
Question 5
Identify an issue that needs to be addressed, the existing services that attempt to address the issue
and the gaps in the existing service; Describe a basic macro-level intervention that was discussed for the identified population at the event, or during your debrief conversation. (150 words )
Question 6
From attending this event and debriefing with a work, describe and define the needs and strengths of the identified community. How do they facilitate the interaction between local neighborhood citizens and local institutions/organize a community event meeting (e.g. mobilization of community members)? (100 words)
Question 7
Describe a framework for practice with the agency or social worker uses within this particular community with regards to evidence-based practice, if applicable; Describe the difficulties practicing social workers experience when attempting to execute a community solution or strategic plan. (100 words)
Question 8
Describe the approach the meeting had; was it a structured and productive meeting? Did it include an agenda? If you interviewed a social worker, describe their approach to addressing the issues within the community; do they have an organized plan, or is it unstructured/casual? (70 words)
Question 9
How did the organizers begin meeting as a group? Do know you the history of such an event/community meeting? If you interviewed a field worker/social worker, how long has their agency worked for the identified population? (50 words or less)
Question 10
Include who is the leader of the event, or the leader of the agency. How do they fulfill this role? (50 words or less)
Question 11
Share 3 points the speaker or the leader (or the social worker you interviewed) that stood out to you.
Question 12
What role did experienced members play in this group at the event (or would throughout the agency)? How were new members integrated into the group(warm and welcoming/or passive aggressive)? (110 words)
Question 13
Identify 3 things you heard that stood out to you, and what these statements caught your attention. (110 words)
Question 14
Indicate how your beliefs about the identified population were either confirmed or changed by attending the meeting/interviewing field social worker. Explain by giving examples how your attendance either confirmed or changed your views. (110 words)
Question 15
Think back to when you attended the meeting and interviewed a social worker/community worker. Reflect on your feelings, thoughts, and reflections you experience during the meeting and afterwards. Share and note your reflections here, as this is an are important process within the macro social work integration. (110 words)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!