Regulation of Hazardous Wastes by RCRA Project
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Regulation of Hazardous Wastes by RCRA Project
The deposition of hazardous and nonhazardous wastes into the environment has become an issue of concern around the world. With increased industrialization and urbanization around the world, the trends in environmental conservation needs are worrying. There are different bodies which are tasked with environmental regulation and conservation.
There are bodies which are tasked with the regulation of hazardous and nonhazardous wastes in United States. Some of the acts which regulate the deposition of hazardous and nonhazardous wastes in United States include Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). RCRA regulates how wastes should be managed in order to avoid any potential harm to the environment and to the people (Nanda & Berruti, 2021).
RCRA creates a framework to ensure that both hazardous and nonhazardous wastes are well managed. RCRA deals with the management of solid wastes into the environment. This makes RCRA a key regulation in protection of the environment and its conservation.
RCRA has its own legacies. These legacies are working to a large percentage. The reduction of in release of hazardous wastes into the environment in United States. Between the years 2007 and 2019, the rate if release of hazardous wastes in the air reduced by 57% with that of release into the surface water and soil reducing by 16% and 21% respectively (EPA, 2021).
Additionally, there is a substantive reduction in the amount of non-hazardous solid wastes which are released into the environment every year in United States. This makes the environment cleaner and more favorable and accommodative to human beings and other animals. This shows that there are positive impacts that are being driven by the use of RCRA regulations in environmental protection.
Regulation of Hazardous and non-hazardous solid wastes by RCRA is a topic of interest to the class and to myself. Every country in the world is fighting to reduce the release of wastes into the environment and to reduce the rate of pollution. Over the past years, there has been an increase in global cases of diseases attributed to hazardous wastes.
Hazardous wastes cause skin irritation and skin diseases, difficulties in breathing as well as headaches and other types of diseases (Sjöberg & Xu, 2018). These diseases can be prevented by ensuring that the legacies of RCRA are promoted and that the policies are fully implemented.
Additionally, the deposition of solid wastes into water bodies and the environment results into environmental pollution which degrades the soil and kills aquatic animals if deposited into water bodies.
It is thus a matter of concern to understand the regulations which govern the process of release of wastes into the environment and the consequences which people face for faulting these regulations. The class would thus be interested in understanding the RCRA regulations and how they work. They would also be interested in knowing if there are merits achieved from these regulations.
The topic is not easy to find comprehensive results on and this is why it has not been fully explored. There are standards of reportable incidences of hazardous release into the environment.
As a result, not all hazardous releases are made public or are reported under RCRA and thus, finding the exact data on the level of effectiveness of these acts and whether the legacies are fully working or not is not easy. More companies are coming up with mechanisms of handling hazardous wastes, some which are not yet deemed as being fully effective.
References
EPA. (2021). Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Laws and Regulations
Retrieved From: https://www.epa.gov/rcra
Nanda, S., & Berruti, F. (2021). Municipal solid waste management and landfilling technologies: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 19(2), 1433-1456. Retrieved From: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10311-020-01100-y
Sjöberg, E., & Xu, J. (2018). An empirical study of US environmental federalism: RCRA enforcement from 1998 to 2011. Ecological economics, 147, 253-263. Retrieved From: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.024
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Regulation of Hazardous Wastes by RCRA Project
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!