Reducing food waste through food sharing apps

Reducing food waste through food sharing apps

Description/Paper Instructions

Reducing food waste through food sharing apps

Food sharing apps are mobile applications that connect individuals, businesses, and non-profit organizations with surplus food to those who need it. These apps are designed to help reduce food waste by redirecting excess food to those who might not have access to it. Food sharing apps have become increasingly popular in recent years as a way to address the issue of food waste and hunger.

One of the key benefits of food sharing apps is that they provide a simple and convenient way for individuals and businesses to donate excess food. These apps allow users to easily post details about the food they have available, including the type of food, quantity, and location. Users who need food can then search for available food in their area and arrange for pickup or delivery.

Food sharing apps are also an effective way to reduce food waste in the restaurant and hospitality industry. Many restaurants and hotels often have excess food at the end of the day that goes unsold and unused. By using food sharing apps, these businesses can easily donate their excess food to local charities and non-profit organizations, rather than throwing it away.

Another advantage of food sharing apps is that they provide a platform for community building and social connection. Many food sharing apps encourage users to get involved in local food-sharing initiatives, connecting them with like-minded individuals and organizations in their area. This can help create a sense of community and shared purpose around reducing food waste and supporting local food systems.

Food sharing apps can also help to address food insecurity and hunger. In many communities, there are individuals and families who do not have access to enough food. Food sharing apps can help connect these individuals with sources of food that might otherwise go to waste, providing them with much-needed nourishment and support.

However, there are some challenges and limitations to food sharing apps. One issue is that not everyone has access to a smartphone or internet connection, which can limit participation in these apps. Additionally, there are concerns about food safety and hygiene, as well as liability issues for businesses and individuals who donate food.

Despite these challenges, food sharing apps have the potential to make a significant impact in reducing food waste and hunger. By providing a convenient and accessible platform for food sharing, these apps can help to create more sustainable and equitable food systems. Additionally, food sharing apps can help raise awareness about the issue of food waste and the importance of reducing waste in our daily lives.

In conclusion, food sharing apps are a promising tool for reducing food waste and addressing food insecurity. These apps provide a platform for individuals, businesses, and non-profit organizations to connect with one another and redirect excess food to those who need it. By harnessing the power of technology and community engagement, food sharing apps can help create a more sustainable and equitable food system for all.

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Reducing food waste through food sharing apps

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!