Recycling A Certain Tonnage of Electronic Waste Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Recycling A Certain Tonnage of Electronic Waste Assignment
Paper details:
Followings are the introduction of the case6(I will put case in the file, and here is only a discussion for the discussion board, not a paper) INSTRUCTIONS: Product-stewardship services relied on an Australian government regulatory framework built on the concept of extended producer responsibility (EPR), a policy that required producers to manage their product’s end-of-life segment by recycling a certain tonnage of electronic waste relative to their product tonnage imported into Australia. Enviro solutions was one of the approved providers of business-to-business (B2B) logistics services for collecting and recycling waste on behalf of producers. In response to requests by ANZRP, a competing provider, the Australian regulator decided not to separate the categories of computers and televisions, but to set combined recycling tonnage requirements.
As the in-house expert on regulation, Nichole Green, The Account Manager for Product Stewardship, decides to bring this matter up with the senior director of Enviro solutions, Peter Bruce, and with the operations and compliance manager, Mark Philips. Given the regulatory changes and the entry of a new provider, they need to analyze the regulatory and competitive environment to fine-tune their future strategy.
With the initial success in Australia, DHL is also evaluating the feasibility of their success in product-stewardship services in other Asian markets. Learning Objective This case discusses the benefits of extended producer responsibility and reverse logistics. It is suitable for a course on sustainable operations or supply chain management. The case also lends itself to a discussion of the competitive strategy of a B2B service provider and can be used in a course on strategic management or competitive strategy.
Students should focus on the logistical aspects of the case and doing business and engaging in logistics in the Australia. They may wish to address and discuss several of the following: Discuss what ways the Australian Product Stewardship regulation aim to protect the environment? Is it effective in doing so effective in doing so? What are the pros and cons of this take-back regulation? Why did ANZRP ask the government to use a combined quota instead of separate quotas for television and computer categories?
Why do you think the government agreed to the requested change? Does this change make the producer responsibility more collective or more individual? With a 10% margin, estimate how much DHL Enviro solutions charged its computer customers and television customers per tonne before and after the regulatory change. How will the change in EPR regulation affect DHL Enviro solutions? Describe the end-of-life supply chain for television and computer products in Australia under the regulation. Analyze the market position and performance of DHL Enviro solutions as a co-regulatory arrangement for e-waste in Australia and explain its success. How should DHL Enviro solutions Australia position itself competitively visavis ANZRP and SIMS recycling?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!