Order ID | 53563633773 |
Type | Essay |
Writer Level | Masters |
Style | APA |
Sources/References | 4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order | 5-10 Pages |
Reality of the American Dream Reflective Paper
Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/xjur
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Exhibit. It has been
accepted for inclusion in Xavier Journal of Undergraduate Research by an
authorized editor of Exhibit. For more information, please
contact exhibit@xavier.edu.
Recommended Citation High, Madeline (2015) "The Reality of the American Dream,"
Xavier Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 3, Article 2. Available at:
https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/xjur/vol3/iss1/2
https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/xjur?utm_source=www.exhibit.xavier.edu%2Fxjur%2F
vol3%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/xjur/vol3?utm_source=www.exhibit.xavier.edu%2Fxjur
%2Fvol3%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/xjur/vol3/iss1/2?utm_source=www.exhibit.xavier.edu
%2Fxjur%2Fvol3%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPag
es
https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/xjur?utm_source=www.exhibit.xavier.edu%2Fxjur%2F
vol3%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/xjur/vol3/iss1/2?utm_source=www.exhibit.xavier.edu
%2Fxjur%2Fvol3%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPag
es
Finding The Good Life in the 21st Century Madeline High
The American Dream is best defined by James Truslow Adams as a “dream of land
in which life should be better and richer and fuller for every man, with the opportunity
for each
according to his ability or achievement” (Adams 404). Throughout the centuries of
the United States, a better and fuller life has meant different things to different
people. Today, a better and fuller life is often viewed in terms of economic and
material prosperity such as buying your dream house or car.
Since the founding of the United States, the American Dream has continued to
become more and more materialistic. The value of people’s success is not measured
in their quality of life, but through the amount of property they have. Our society is
very consumer driven and greatly emphasizes the importance of material gain.
It is undeniable that the material prosperity of our country has made life easier and
more efficient for many people and that it plays an important role in the American
Dream: economic success can help people attain certain dreams such as financial
security.
However, I believe that people’s view of a better and fuller life is grossly unbalanced
and narrowly defined. Many people tend to associate the Dream only with economic
prosperity. The association of the Dream with quality of life is largely neglected.
I argue that two of the greatest challenges facing the American Dream today are 1)
the emphasis on material prosperity and 2) the wealth inequality in the United States.
In order for the American Dream to become fully available to more people, there
needs to be a balance between economic prosperity and the quality of life.
The focus on material gain instead of the quality of life has created an unequal
playing field for people in the United States which has led to wealth inequality. There
are many people who work hard and are unable to make ends meet while there are
others at the top who are at an unequal advantage because they received an
inheritance or some type of financial support.
The focus on materialism and consumption has decreased people’s ability to be
satisfied. Americans work so hard for material gain that they often are unable to find
joy and excitement in their lives. James Truslow Adams described it best, writing:
“we forgot to live, in the struggle to ‘make a living’” (406).
The issue of materialism and wealth inequality is not a modern issue. At the time of
perceived upward mobility during the mid- 1800’s, over 90 percent of the people at
the top inherited money, and only 2 percent of the people at the bottom were able to
rise from the bottom to the top (Fortin).
While the nation believed that individuals could rise from poverty to wealth, this
scenario was not very realistic. One example of this misperception was the election
of Andrew Jackson. The Age of Jackson has often been interpreted as the age of the
common man. Jackson in fact represented the uncommon man rising from rags to
riches.
Many Americans identified with the ideals of hard work, self-reliance, and
determination that Jackson represented. However, while Jackson was personified as
a symbol of the American Dream to the people, it was truly uncommon
circumstances (and men of wealth) that helped Jackson get into the White House.
For the first time in U.S. history, one million dollars was spent on advertising
Jackson’s campaign.
The wealth gap in the United States remained relatively the same over the next
century. During the Industrial Revolution the U.S. made a dramatic shift from an
agriculture society to a predominately industrial society. The new industry created
advancements that enhanced the lives for many.
While the lives of almost all people, including those at the bottom did improve
materialistically, it did not lessen the wealth gap. One percent of the population still
controlled 20 percent of the wealth, and 10 percent of the population-controlled 50
percent of the wealth (Fortin). Since the Industrial Revolution, the wealth gap in the
United States has increased dramatically.
In an article, “Who Rules America: Wealth, Income and Power,” Professor William G.
Domhoff researched the trends of wealth inequality in our country in the year 2010.
Domhoff asserts that “in terms of financial wealth (total net worth minus the value of
one's home), the top 1% of households had an even greater share: 42.1%”
(Domhoff).
This is over double the amount of wealth controlled by the top 1 percent during the
Industrial Revolution. Through these statistics, it is evident that the wealth gap in our
country is growing. I believe that the growing wealth gap is making it easier for the
people at the top to achieve their dreams but more difficult for the people at the
bottom to succeed.
In the past many people came to the United States to leave the stratified European
society. However, upward mobility is becoming increasingly difficult in the United
States. According to research by the PEW charitable trusts, “43 percent of
Americans raised at the bottom of the income ladder remain stuck there as adults,
and 70 percent never even make it to the middle” (1).
The data shows that the dream of rising to the top economically is only available to a
select few. The wealth gap in the U.S. is also much more dramatic than in the
majority of European countries. According to the CIA Factbook, the United States
has the 41st highest “degree of inequality in the distribution of family income in a
country” (“The World Factbook”).
The CIA’s list consists of 141 different countries. The countries at the bottom of the
list, which are the countries with the greatest equality of wealth, are mostly European
countries. The United Kingdom has the 35th most equal distribution of wealth and
Germany has the 12th most equal distribution of wealth. (“The World Factbook”).
This information strongly contradicts the belief that the United States is a less
stratified society compared to Europe. The extreme difference between the degree of
inequality of wealth between the U.S. and other European countries emphasizes that
much wealth inequality exists in the United States.
Wealth inequality in the United States has also played a large role in people’s
perception of achieving the American Dream. In a study of the American Dream
entitled, “Can the American Dream Survive the New Multiethnic America?
Evidence from Los Angeles,” Mara A. Cohen-Marks and Christopher Stout
interviewed people of different ethnic groups regarding their perception of the
American Dream. The results show that the people interviewed believed materialism
and the notion of economic prosperity played a large role in people’s perception of
the American Dream.
The results confirm a “strong association between homeownership and the American
dream” (834). The study also showed that “income is highly correlated with
perceptions of achievement of the American dream. Angelinos with the highest
household incomes are 50% more likely to believe that they have achieved the
American dream than are the poorest respondents in our data set” (835).
The statistics suggest that the Dream has come to seem exclusive. People who are
poor are less likely to believe that they can achieve the American Dream. Reasons
for the increasing wealth gap in the United States are presented in Heather Beth
Johnson’s book, The American Dream and the Power of Wealth.
Johnson interviewed and analyzed black and white families regarding the power of
wealth and the American Dream. In her interviews with families, many people
attributed their success to their own hard work, and many of the families that were
struggling blamed themselves for their failures. Johnson however, affirms that
financial success is not based solely on hard work. She attributes many families’
success to intergenerational transfers.
“Intergenerational transfers” refers to the passing along of assets both at death and
throughout one’s life” (8). Through her research, Johnson discovered that the
majority of wealth, “between one-half to more than 80 percent all accumulated
wealth is received through intergenerational transfers of assets” (7).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDERCLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernowAlso, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|