Real-time monitoring for medication safety
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Real-time monitoring for medication safety
Real-time monitoring for medication safety refers to the use of technology to monitor medication use and identify potential adverse reactions or interactions in real-time. This technology can help to improve medication safety by providing healthcare professionals with timely information about a patient’s medication use and any potential risks associated with their treatment.
There are several benefits of real-time monitoring for medication safety. One of the key benefits is the ability to identify potential adverse reactions or interactions quickly. This can help to prevent serious health complications and even save lives. By monitoring medication use in real-time, healthcare professionals can identify potential issues before they become more serious, allowing for prompt intervention.
Real-time monitoring for medication safety can also help to reduce healthcare costs by reducing the number of adverse events that require hospitalization or other forms of medical intervention. It can also help to improve patient outcomes by ensuring that patients receive appropriate and timely treatment for any adverse events that do occur.
One example of real-time monitoring for medication safety is the use of electronic health records (EHRs) and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems. These systems allow healthcare professionals to access patient medication information in real-time, including information about drug interactions and contraindications. This information can help healthcare professionals to make more informed decisions about medication use and avoid potential adverse events.
Another example of real-time monitoring for medication safety is the use of medication reconciliation processes. Medication reconciliation involves comparing a patient’s current medication regimen to their medical history and any previous medication use. This process can help to identify potential issues with medication use, such as duplicate therapies or drug interactions. By conducting medication reconciliation in real-time, healthcare professionals can identify potential issues before they become more serious.
Pharmacovigilance is another important aspect of real-time monitoring for medication safety. Pharmacovigilance involves monitoring the safety of medications after they have been approved for use. This process can help to identify potential adverse events or interactions that were not identified during the clinical trial process. By monitoring medication safety in real-time, healthcare professionals can identify potential issues with new medications more quickly, allowing for prompt intervention.
There are also several challenges associated with real-time monitoring for medication safety. One of the main challenges is the need for accurate and up-to-date medication information. This requires healthcare professionals to have access to complete and accurate medication histories for their patients, which can be challenging in some healthcare settings.
Another challenge is the need for healthcare professionals to be adequately trained in the use of real-time monitoring technology. Healthcare professionals need to understand how to use these systems effectively and how to interpret the information that they provide. This requires ongoing training and education to ensure that healthcare professionals are able to use these systems effectively.
In conclusion, real-time monitoring for medication safety has the potential to greatly improve medication safety by identifying potential adverse events or interactions in real-time. While there are challenges associated with the implementation of these systems, ongoing efforts to improve medication safety through real-time monitoring will help to ensure that patients receive the best possible care. By working together, healthcare professionals can harness the power of technology to improve medication safety and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Real-time monitoring for medication safety
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!