Questions about the Economy Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Assignment on economics questions
This is a one-on-one task. Please do everything on your own. There may be numerous correct answers to a question. Answers should be brief and in the form of bullet points if possible. Answers should be roughly 1000 words long (for all questions combined) and should not exceed 1500 words. Your responses should be written in your own words. You should not cite others, and you are not required to offer references or citations because you are answering in your own words.
RBA is the first question. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) considerably increased (more than quadrupled) its balance sheet last year by purchasing government debt. The following criticisms have been made: (1) This approach causes significant inflation; (2) it amounts to debt monetization. It has also been suggested that the RBA is no longer working as an independent central bank in relation to this criticism. Do you agree with these points of contention? Explain why you think that is or why you don’t think that is. If you were an RBA governor’s counselor, how would you advise him to explain RBA policies and respond to critics?
Question 2: The Federal Reserve will meet on June 16th. The FOMC released new economic projections at its most recent meeting, which can be seen here: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/file… I Did members of the Committee alter their inflation forecasts, and if so, how? (ii) Did Committee members’ unemployment projections change, and if so, how? (iii) Based on your responses, did you anticipate the FOMC changing its interest rate policy in June? What is the interest rate policy forecast for 2022? Explain. (iv) At the meeting, the FOMC did not make any changes to its interest rate policy. Was this a prudent decision or a policy blunder? Explain.
Question 3: The European Central Bank and Climate Change The European Central Bank (ECB) has stated that as part of its ongoing policy strategy review, it will consider ways to alter its policies to better contribute to environmental sustainability. One method it can achieve this is by providing green (environmentally friendly) firms preferential treatment over brown (unfriendly to the environment) corporations (less friendly). The European Central Bank, for example, acquires corporate bonds as part of its monetary policy. It is now purchasing bonds in a balanced manner.
I A more “green” approach would be to exclusively buy “green” bonds, penalizing “brown” businesses. If the ECB decides to penalize “brown” firms in this way, it will have massive distributional implications across industries and member states. Some argue that monetary policy has no role in this. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss.
(ii) The ECB might also utilize its asset purchases to give state governments with incentives: The ECB has the power to discriminate against the most polluting countries (on a per capita basis). The ECB is the central bank of 19 member states, some of which pollute significantly more than others (per capita). To provide governments with incentives, the ECB may halt purchases of government debt from, say, the five most polluting countries and instead buy proportionately more government debt from the five least polluting countries. This would undoubtedly provide governments with incentives to implement green policies as soon as possible. However, some argue that monetary policy does not play this function. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss
Writing skills are required, as well as a.doc file.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!