Pulmonary Thromboembolism Nursing Term Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Sources: 31-page Draft / Summary:0/1(You need to provide a 275 word summary of your paper’s main points/an extra 275 word draft of your paper within the first 30% of your paper’s deadline)Subject: NursingTopic: Pulmonary thromboembolismPaper details:
Denmark Technical College Denmark SC The following is the assignment for which this sample case study presentation was written. Assignment: Written Case Presentation Choose a patient from your clinical experience or assigned case study and develop a written clinical case presentation. 1) Use a clinical decision-making process to present your patient, for example: a) SUBJECTIVE DATA i) Chief complaint ii) Past medical history iii) Family history iv) Social history/Spiritual v) A focused review of systems vi) Cluster the data to determine or modify the differential diagnoses. b) OBJECTIVE DATA i) Complete a focused physical exam. ii) Identify any additional diagnostic data. c) ASSESSMENT i) Determine your nursing diagnosis(es)/ collaborative problem(s). ii) Write two nursing diagnoses statements.
d) PLAN i) Identify a prioritized plan of care that addresses the patient’s needs related to each of the nursing diagnoses and collaborative problems you determined. ii) Interventions (1) The plan should include two evidence-based interventions with rationale and target specific etiologies of illness or risk behaviors. (2) The interventions integrate the unique needs of the patient. (3) The interventions have measurable outcomes. iii) For each nursing diagnosis or collaborative problem, determine at least two specific measurable patient outcomes. (1) Examples of outcomes include: • Improved clinical status.
• Quality of life • Functional status • Alleviation or remediation of symptoms • Patient satisfaction and cost of care e) EVALUATION i) Describe methods (how you will evaluate the effectiveness) you will use to evaluate your patient’s outcomes. ii) At least three evidence-based resources should be used along with other descriptive references. iii) Reference and citations should be in APA 7th ed format. f) CONCLUSION i) Give an overall appraisal of what you have learned from this case study. Refer to the grading rubric. Unsatisfactory Less Than Satisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent PTs Content 60% Subjective Data -Chief complaint, Past medical history, Family history, Social/Spiritual history, and functional health pattern assessment. Cluster the data and determine/modify differential diagnoses 1 Point Minimal to no subjective data.
5 Points Insufficient subjective data 7 Points Includes all the elements of subjective data but lacks comprehensiveness 10 Points It includes of every element of the subjective and objective data in a comprehensive detailed manner for each element. 10 Objective Data -Complete focused physical exam including related systems. -Identification of diagnostic data. 1 Point Minimal to no objective data 5 Points Insufficient subjective and/or objective data 7 Points Includes all the elements of subjective and objective data but lacks in comprehensiveness 10 Points Includes every element of the subjective and objective data in a comprehensive detailed manner for each element.
10 Assessment Determined nursing diagnosis(es) and collaborative problem(s). 1 Point Does not clearly include assessment, plan and interventions. 5 Points Includes incomplete assessment, plan and/or interventions. 7 Points Adequately includes an assessment, plan and interventions. 10 Points Clearly includes and articulates assessment, plan and interventions. 10 Plan For each nursing diagnosis or collaborative problem determined at least two specific measurable patient outcomes. The plan also includes nursing interventions that are evidence-based with rationale and target specific etiologies of illness or risk behaviors. Interventions integrate the unique needs of the patient.
1 Point Interventions are not clearly evidence-based and do not include rationale. Interventions do not target specific etiologies of illness or risk behaviors. Interventions do not integrate the unique needs of the patient. 5 Points Interventions loosely supported by evidence with minimal rationale. Some interventions target specific etiologies of illness or risk behaviors. Interventions do not clearly integrate the unique needs of the patient. 7 Points Interventions are evidence-based for the most part with rationale provided. Interventions target specific etiologies of illness or risk behaviors.
Some interventions integrate the unique needs of the patient. 10 Points All interventions are evidence-based by >2 EBP articles and standards of care that are evidence-based. Rationale for each intervention is clearly identified with comprehensive rationale provided and clearly present in a comprehensive manner. 10 Evaluation Describe the methods used to evaluate each of the patient outcomes. 1 Points Evaluation does not clearly describe the methods used to evaluate each patient outcome. 5 Points Incomplete description of the methods used to evaluate each patient outcome.
7 Points Some detail in describing the methods used to evaluate each patient outcome. 10 Points Comprehensive detail in describing the methods used to evaluate each patient outcome. 10 Conclusion Identify three research questions based on the case study. Support the three research questions with a brief discussion of evidence-based resources along with other descriptive references. 1 Points Less than 2 research questions based on the case study are without EBP/descriptive. resource support. No discussion. 5 Points Identifies 2 research questions based on the case study. Less than resources and one descriptive resource. No discussion two EBP 7 Points Identifies 3 research questions.
Two EBP resources and one descriptive resource. Minimal discussion on resource support apparent. 10 points Identifies 3 research questions based on the case study. Three EBP resources and two to three descriptive resources provided. Brief rich discussion of resource support that is clearly articulated. 10 Format and Style 40% Appearance/Layout 1 point Inadequate appearance & layout. 5 Points Uneven appearance & layout. 7 Points Adequate appearance & layout. 10 Points Excellent appearance & layout. 10 Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, and grammar) 1 Point Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
5 Points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors that distract the reader. 7 Points Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. 10 Points Writer is clearly in control of standard, written American English. 10 Headings 1 Points Headings are not used or only one heading is identified. Reading is impeded without use of headings. 5 Points Headings are incorrect. Headings are appropriate to subsequent written information.
Uses at least 2 reflect assignment description. headings that 7 Points Headings are partially incorrect. Headings are correlated with subsequent written. information that reflects assignment description for the most part. 10 Points Headings are used correctly. Headings reflect assignment description and are appropriate to their subsequent written information clearly guiding the reader along with ease. 10 References 1 Points No references. 5 Points Insufficient use of references. 7 Points References are loosely used. 10 Points Correct references. 1
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!