Providing For Persons with Special Needs In Shelters
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Providing For Persons with Special Needs In Shelters
answer 3
Identify some of the legal, medical and ethical issues that may arise from not providing for persons with special needs in shelters.
Legal issues:
In emergencies, there are legal, medical and ethical issues that may arise in case people with special needs are not provided for their needs in emergency shelters. Federal legislation requires that people with special needs be accorded support by making provisions required as per resources available during emergencies (Francis & Silvers, 2015). It is illegal to discriminate against these people in the provision of needs to these people.
According to various state and Federal policies, needs like sleeping space, access ways, and medical supply or other necessities should be availed to these people without discrimination. Discriminating against these people may worsen their traumatic conditions developed due to the disaster experienced. Therefore, it is illegal to discriminate against these people in any way, and one can stand trial for discriminating against them (Weiss, 2018).
Medical issues:
During an emergency, the health of victims is always a concern. This is because of the possibilities of disease outbreaks, disease contractions in cases of communicable diseases and the possibility of worsening of conditions that might be present before disasters (Meyer, Vatcheva, Castellanos & Reininger, 2015). Therefore, among other provisions usually presented in an emergency shelter, is medical attention where medical supply come in handy.
Persons with special needs also happen to be in need of special attention in such scenarios. This is because those with health issues before emergencies might have their conditions worsening if not accorded the attention required. Additionally, due to neglect, they might end up contracting diseases in case they are left unattended in situations beyond their ability to handle themselves (Meyer, Vatcheva, Castellanos & Reininger, 2015).
Ethical issues:
In cases of an emergency, it is expected that people hope in first responders for support and provisions. In such scenarios, not all people usually have the same needs. Some may need medical attention than others, while others may be in need of basic provisions like food, clothing, and shelter. People with special needs will require all these and additional special attention for their special needs. Therefore, these people will expect that attention is given to their needs. It is therefore ethical that support providers consider their plight and offer support and provisions that aim at alleviating their distress in emergencies (Phillips, Neal & Webb, 2016). Lack of attention might demoralize them into a situation that might worsen their conditions.
Choose 5 inexpensive expedient “fixes” which can be employed in a shelter to increase accessibility
sign language personnel and experts, this should be done by the coordination with other organization in the affected community.
Having a different type of child toys for different ages such as painting books and color pencil so you can help children to adapt to new condition.
Flashlights with a great number of batteries.
Have a proper sign in place, Sign should direct clients to key locations throughout the facility. The sign should be 8 appropriate to the needs of the population, this may require signs to be published in multiple languages and formats. For example, having a picture board that helps persons who have difficulty verbalizing their needs.
Provide a private area for mother with an infant and private area for religious or culture reasons.
References
Meyer, L., Vatcheva, K., Castellanos, S., & Reininger, B. (2015). Barriers to disaster preparedness
among medical special needs populations. Frontiers in public health, 3, 205.
Phillips, B., Neal, D. M., & Webb, G. (2016). Introduction to emergency management. CRC
Press.
Weiss, T. G. (2018). Humanitarian challenges and intervention. Routledge.
Francis, L., & Silvers, A. (Eds.). (2015). Americans with disabilities. Routledge.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!