Proposing an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Project
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Proposing an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Project
Objective:
- Explain the role of nursing research within clinical practice.
Topic:
Overview
In this assignment, you will describe a patient problem that you see or have seen in practice. You will then identify, revise, or develop a policy, protocol, algorithm, or standardized guideline to be used in your practice site that is based on current research evidence. You are proposing the implementation of an intervention that is supported by research; thus, you are proposing an evidence-based practice (EBP) project. You are not proposing a
study to be conducted in your agency.
Your final paper should be no more than 5 pages, which does not include the protocol, policy, or algorithm, and references for your project. This assignment is worth 100 points.
Ideas for Selection of an Evidence-Based Intervention for Practice
Describe a patient problem that is relevant to your practice. It can be any patient care problem or issue that is of interest to you in your current practice or for your future role as an administrator. Find an intervention that is considered effective based on research to manage this problem. Important clinical areas that have been researched include the following:
- Fall prevention or management
- Prevention of pressure ulcers
- IV and/or arterial line management
- Infection control problems—select a specific situation
- Pain identification, documentation, and/or management
- Visitation in ICUs
- Family involvement intervention based on research
- Nurse Retention intervention
- Alternative staffing process
- Safety—pick a specific situation and implement a research-based intervention to manage it.
- Shift of care from hospital to home and/or ambulatory care centers
- Nursing leadership—effective leadership behavior that is research based
- Communication of shift report in specialized way based on research
- Provision of specific aspect of care (research-based intervention) to patients with illness such as hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive lung disease, asthma, obesity, renal problems, gastrointestinal problems, or mental health problems.
Include the following in your paper:
- Introduction—provide a brief introduction of your paper including a purpose statement at the end of the introduction (one paragraph)
- Summarize your project topic—include a summary of the patient problem project you chose and the rationale for choosing it; provide support for choosing your topic from the healthcare literature showing that this is a patient problem (2-3 paragraphs)
- Literature review—include relevant scholarly, peer-reviewed articles that discuss your patient problem and the proposed intervention. Summarize what is known and not know about the problem selected. At least 3-5 articles should be included in your literature review. (3-5 paragraphs)
- Proposed Change—Discuss your revision/identification/development of a policy/protocol/algorithm/standardized guideline to be used in your practice site; analyze how it will be implemented and potential affected parties. (provide a copy as an appendix to your paper with any relevant references included) If you are revising a current policy/protocol, please include the original, as well. (3-5 paragraphs)
- Conclusion—Summarize your paper including your patient problem and proposed change; do not introduce new information here, simply synthesis the information you provided in your paper.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction/Conclusion
30 pts Level 5
Grabs the reader’s attention; provides a complete and concise introduction/conclusion to the paper; a purpose statement relevant to the paper is included.
27 pts Level 4
Interesting & might get the reader’s attention; provides a complete introduction/conclusion; purpose statement is included, but is vaguely worded.
24 pts Level 3
Relevant but does not engage the reader’s attention; provides an introduction/conclusion, but it is incomplete, lengthy, or too short; purpose statement is included, but is vaguely worded.
21 pts Level 2
Relevant but does not engage the reader’s attention; provides an introduction/conclusion, but it is incomplete, lengthy, and/or too short; purpose statement not included
18 pts Level 1
Dull or trite introduction/conclusion; incomplete or rambling; no purpose statement included.
0 pts Level 0
No paper was submitted.
30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject Summary NM465-CO4
30 pts Level 5
Includes a summary of the patient problem project chosen and the rationale for choosing it; support is provided for chosen topic from the healthcare literature showing that this is a patient problem; the summary is well-developed and provides sufficient detail.
27 pts Level 4
Includes a summary of the patient problem project chosen and the rationale for choosing it; support is provided for chosen topic from the healthcare literature showing that this is a patient problem; the summary is developed, but lacks depth.
24 pts Level 3
Includes a summary of the patient problem project chosen; rationale included, but not well-defined; the topic was not supported by literature as a patient problem; the summary is partially developed.
21 pts Level 2
Includes an incomplete summary of the patient problem project chosen; rationale, if included, was not well-defined or supported by literature.
18 pts Level 1
The summary did not discuss the patient problem; no rationale included; rambling or incoherent ideas.
0 pts Level 0
No paper was submitted.
30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review NM465-CO4
30 pts Level 5
3-5 relevant, scholarly, peer-reviewed articles related to patient problem/proposed intervention are synthesized; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is included.
27 pts Level 4
3-5 relevant, scholarly, peer-reviewed articles related to patient problem/proposed intervention are included, but findings are not synthesized; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is included.
24 pts Level 3
3-5 articles related to patient problem/proposed intervention are included, but they are either not relevant, not scholarly, or not peer-reviewed; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is included.
21 pts Level 2
Less than 3 articles included OR articles included are not related to the chosen topic; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is not included.
18 pts Level 1
Less than 3 articles included; no summary of what is known/not known about the problem not included; rambling or incoherent ideas.
0 pts Level 0
No paper was submitted.
30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposed Change NM465-CO4
30 pts Level 5
The proposed change is discussed in sufficient detail; analysis of implementation is well-developed; potential affected parties are discussed.
27 pts Level 4
The proposed change is discussed; analysis of implementation is somewhat developed; potential affected parties are discussed.
24 pts Level 3
The proposed change is discussed, but lacks details; analysis of implementation is partially developed; potential affected parties are identified.
21 pts Level 2
The proposed change is not discussed sufficiently; analysis of implementation is poorly developed; potential affected parties are identified.
18 pts Level 1
The proposed change is not discussed in a coherent manner; analysis of implementation is not included; potential affected parties are not identified.
0 pts Level 0
No paper was submitted.
30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar/APA PRICE-I
30 pts Level 5
Mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors. APA format was used correctly. Thoughts flow cohesively throughout the paper.
27 pts Level 4
Minimal grammatical and spelling errors. APA format was followed with minimal mistakes. Thoughts flow cohesively throughout the paper.
24 pts Level 3
Moderate amounts of grammatical and spelling errors. APA format was followed but inconsistently; paper does not flow and does not tie the information together.
21 pts Level 2
Major grammatical and spelling errors. APA was used incorrectly. Paper does not flow and does not tie the information together.
18 pts Level 1
An unacceptable number of spelling, and grammar. APA format was not followed. Rambling or incoherent ideas throughout the paper.
0 pts Level 0
No paper was submitted.
30 pts Total Points: 150
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!