Proposal on improving eyewitness evidence value
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Wells, G. L., Memon, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its Probative Value .Psychological Science in the Public Interest
In this research, researchers explain empirical evidence supporting the proposal that some of the problems with eyewitness evidence can be discussed by improving how the evidence is collected and conserved. The authors explain how psychologists challenged the value of eyewitness testimony for decades before the introduction of forensic DNA testing. In the early part of the 20th century, Hugo Münsterberg’s writings made a clear argument for psychological science’s role in helping the justice system recognize the vagaries of eyewitness evidence. However, it was not until the mid to late 1970s that psychologists started to hide. In the research it provided a case with data about Kirk Bloodworth, who was sentenced to death in 1984 for sexual assault and slaying a 9-year-old girl. Bloodsworth maintained a claim of innocence from the outset, but the DNA testing proved he was not the source of semen found in the little girl’s underwear. Some people, including one of the original prosecutors, continued to believe that Bloodsworth may have been the murderer. In September 2003, DNA testing got a hit on the actual murderer, Kimberly Shay Ruffner. This research demonstrates the changes from the 1960 eyewitness to the modern era’s presents. DNA testing has developed by identifying the people they needed because, in the older times, they used to sentence innocent people they have mistaken. Since people would use their memory.
when it comes to the research methodology in this data, the eyewitness research was already dominated by the experimental method, and most of the studies are research lab. According to the data improvements and disadvantages of Lab-based laboratory approaches for researching eyewitness issues. In the mythology part of the experiment, they pointed out the outcome that the serious quality of trial methods is that they are experienced in creating relationships of cause and effect. In the research using machine variables which is very important in the research. The main point of the method is questioning the eyewitnesses to help them back track to the correct memories. This is something they use in the psychological theory of memory according in Fisher & Geiselman journal (1992). Studies also get information or their research from the the ECI and elements of the CI. The researchers Hasel and Wells stated the probability of pick the original target from sets of four alternative faces could be only 35% for individual composites and 48% for four-composite morphs (chance = 25%). In another experiment conducted by Wixted and wells they conducted a table plot by seeing if the research calculates the precision of a suspect’s identification on a scale of 100 as a function of trust. High trust means very high precision and much lower precision is indicated by low trust. Similar conclusions from the Houston Police Department field study were recorded by Wixted, Mickes, Dunn, Clark, and Wells (2016). Data gathered to date shows that factors such as the presence of a firearm do not substantially impact the precision of high conviction of initial identifications made. Wixted and Wells (2017) analyzed the related experiments, even though these variables had the predicted negative impact. They did not diminish the accuracy of the total memory precision. Around dubious IDs. Usually, lab experiments make participants see a simulated crime after which various questioning techniques are compared.
In conclusion eyewitness are very important because they provide information that can be said in the criminal trials. Its evidence for the justice system needs in order to do justice. In conclusion we can say that an eyewitness has help in many ways including in the article it stated eyewitness can be involve by training police investigations. Participant witnesses in experiments typically take the perspective of a bystander rather than a victim. However, some experiments have examined possible differences between bystander eyewitnesses and victim eyewitnesses and have found no significant differences. In my opinion after reading the research I can say that the eyewitness testimony may not always be accurate. The Eyewitness testimony can be by people’s memory, the eyewitness testimony can also be false in some parts by the witness due to the person being nervousness or may be afraid when testifying. They can even convict the wrong person by thinking it him or her. the research in the research by Boyce, Beaudry and Lindsay, R. C. L. (2007) it appears , thus it I can say whether individuals may make this difference, but only when they are correct can eyewitnesses gain trust. When I mean by that the accused will also experience the psychological and financial problems connected with detention and prosecution. Yet as a consequence of mistaken identity, they will never be prosecuted. Evidence indicates that people prefer to focus their views on certain variables that do not represent the probability of a right one. Evaluating all 5 articles I can say that I learn things from eyewitness pros and cons of it. from all of the journals I have read I can conclude that the evidence show that the memory is unreliable But we can help try to decrease the incidence of memory distortions.. Particularly in cases where it is difficult to prevent the risk of memory distortions, it is possible to help train judges and jurors about the limits of memory.
References
Wells, G. L., Memon, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its Probative Value Psychological Science in the Public Interest,7(2), pp45-75. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.xWixted, J. T., Mickes, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2018). Rethinking the reliability of eyewitness . Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(3), 324335.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1745691617734878
Eyewitness testimony: probative value in criminal justice system
bureau. Of justice statics
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!