Proposal for Designing a Training Program
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Proposal for Designing a Training Program
Running Header: DESIGNING A TRAINING PROGRAM
DESIGINING A TRAINING PROGRAM 2
Note: This is a template/ guide for Assignment #2. Please delete and replace the information in the brackets with your own information. Also remove the brackets.
Proposal for Designing a Training Program
[First and Last Name]
BUS 407- Training and Development
[Date]
Proposal for Designing a Training Program
Introduction
[ Imagine you are a training consultant and you’ve been asked to create a training program for 20 employees for the course of two days. In this section of your paper, simply summarize in a paragraph or two which company you are choosing to complete for this assignment. This can be the same company you chose for Assignment #1 or an imaginary company. Be sure to state the purpose of the training for your company and how this training will help solve the problem for your small business. Then summarize (in one to two sentences) what you will be discussing throughout your paper.]
Two Day Training Program
[In this section, simply provide the training need for the group of employees. Understanding the gap in performance is key for selecting the right training. Then summarize how your two-day course will be used to help solve the problem. This section of the paper should only summarize the two-day training and the rest of the paper will provide more details of the training.]
Training Needs Analysis
[This section requires you to complete a training needs analysis (TNA). First identify the gap in performance for this small group of individuals and then use the issues to create a training program that can be used to correct the problem. Think about what triggered the training to take place and how can your training program help to get performance back on track. Ask yourself, “who is the training intended for specifically and how they should be trained?” Be sure to identify two to three training needs through the training needs analysis and justify an approach for this training. Refer to chapter 4 for details in completing the needs analysis.]
Training Objectives
[Training objectives are important when developing your design section of your training proposal. This section of your paper requires you to identify an objective to cover during your training course. Think about what you want your participants to learn and retain once they complete your training. Chapter 5 explains how to create an objective. A good objective has three components: desired outcome, conditions, and the standards. It also uses adjectives to describe what the learner will gain from the training. For example, a training objective could read, “identify the steps of effective customer service”. Take this into consideration when building your objective(s) for this training program. Again, see Chapter 5 for details.]
Training Cost
[Use this section to determine the training cost for the training program you are proposing. Include a detailed breakdown of time allotted for each piece, the subsequent cost analysis, and the total cost for the project as a whole. When determining the cost, consider any travel, location, meals, a trainer, and materials required for a successful training. If this is a computerized training or eLearning, what would the cost be for a curriculum designer to create the training? Be detailed and specific for this area.]
Training Methods
[This section should identify the training method(s) to deliver the program to employees, such as an e-Learning module or a face-to-face training program. You could also use a blended learning approach. Justify why you selected this training method and use research to support your answers. See Chapters 6 and 7 for additional details concerning training methods.]
Proposed Training Agenda
[Use this section to create an agenda of activities for the training program. During the agenda, include modules of learning and be sure your agenda reflects the learning objectives for the participants.]
Summary
[Use this section to summarize the paper and highlight how the training will be designed to help resolve the problem for the expected audience. What strategies were used to design the training?]
REFERENCES
[Note: Remove this writing once you insert your references. Five quality references should be listed on this page. Do not simply provide the websites for your references. Use proper formatting here.]
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!