Project Management Best Practices & Personal Performance Evaluation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
According to Kogon, Blakemore, and Wood (2015), many workers in today’s business climate spend an increasing amount of time working on or managing projects. This assignment is designed to help you understand the key components of the project management process, how to select the best project management methodology for your project, and the abilities you’ll need to lead a successful project. You’ve learned that there are many variables to properly managing a project from your readings and videos for this unit, as well as personal experience for many of you. To achieve project success, the project management technique adopted must represent the needs of the firm. These variables include the project’s size and complexity, the project management procedure, and the talents required to accomplish the project successfully.
Respond to the following questions in this 4- to 6-page APA-compliant paper (excluding title and reference pages):
Section 1: Overview of Project Management
Describe the factors that may be utilized to select a project management methodology using your unit readings and videos, as well as at least two other sources, which can be from non-scholarly sources.
Determine at least three project management approaches about which you want to learn more. These can be from your personal experience or study. Include, but not limited to, the following approaches in your overview:
This methodology’s main application
Projects for which this methodology is best suited
Assistance with technology is available.
Cost
Formal project management experience or abilities are essential.
Analyze the similarities and contrasts between these three project management approaches. Completing this type of assessment as a project manager can assist you in determining which strategy you should use the next time you lead a project.
Section 2: Analysis and Selection of Personal Projects
Identify any current projects you’ve worked on in the last year, regardless of their size or context. They could be based on professional or personal experience.
You must choose two sorts of projects for this section: one that was successful and one that was failed. You could choose to choose assignments from various areas of your expertise (i.e., one work-related, another from personal experience). Using various types of projects can assist you in comprehending the applications of the Section 1 work you accomplished.
Successful Project – Personal Analysis
Describe the project, including its size, scope, personal/professional aspects, your role, project charter (if applicable), project duration timeframes, and any other important information.
Describe the project management elements and/or methodology that you employed to complete this task. You will benefit from the research you conducted in Section 1.
Make a list of the talents you used to assist the project succeed. Make a list of the abilities you could have utilized to help the project succeed.
Complete an analysis of where you may have been more successful after this review.
Unsuccessful Project Personal Analysis
Describe the project, including its size, scope, personal/professional aspects, your role, project charter (if applicable), project duration timeframes, and any other important information.
Describe the project management elements and/or methodology that you employed to complete this task (s). You will benefit from the research you conducted in Section 1.
Using the research you did in Section 1 and personal reflection, assess the project for areas of weakness.
Using the study you did in Section 1 and personal reflection, determine what abilities were required to overcome the weak areas.
Provide at least two suggestions for improvement, based on your Section 1 study and personal experiences. Include the project’s strengths that were recognized during its successful management.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!