Programming Capstone Proposal Project
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Programming Capstone Proposal Project
I Need A Broadcasting Chat Server Project In Java
MAIN
I need a Broadcasting chat server Project in Java
Proposal/Requirements document–The proposal document shall clearly describe the planned final project’s end product. This document shall be produced using Microsoft Word (it should contain graphics, images, or tables produced using other applications). It must be written using complete English sentences and have been spell- and grammar-checked. The document must unambiguously describe what the proposed system will do (in other words, its requirements). Any performance requirements (e.g., response time to a keypress) must be documented in the proposal document. The document must also include the following topics: Working title of project, purpose of the project, platform (e.g., Windows, Mac, iOS), intended customer/user (that is, who is the program for?), source of the idea for the project, development environment and/or tools to be used, development language(s), limitations or risks anticipated, schedule (built around the course milestones), estimated number of lines of code, documentation, user training, delivery/installation plan. The document should also include anything not mentioned above that will be relevant or helpful when evaluating the proposal. Use the checklist in section 3.4 of the text (checklist begins on p. 42) as you prepare your requirements; you MUST cover all of these items in your document. A typical proposal/requirements document will be 5-10 pages in length.
Checklist: Requirements
The requirements checklist contains a list of questions to ask yourself about
your project’s requirements. This book doesn’t tell you how to do good requirements
development, and the list won’t tell you how to do one either. Use the list
as a sanity check at construction time to determine how solid the ground that
you’re standing on is—where you are on the requirements Richter scale.
Not all of the checklist questions will apply to your project. If you’re working on
an informal project, you’ll find some that you don’t even need to think about.
You’ll find others that you need to think about but don’t need to answer formally.
If you’re working on a large, formal project, however, you may need to
consider every one.
Specific Functional Requirements
❑ Are all the inputs to the system specified, including their source, accuracy,
range of values, and frequency?
❑ Are all the outputs from the system specified, including their destination,
accuracy, range of values, frequency, and format?
❑ Are all output formats specified for Web pages, reports, and so on?
❑ Are all the external hardware and software interfaces specified?
❑ Are all the external communication interfaces specified, including handshaking,
error-checking, and communication protocols?
❑ Are all the tasks the user wants to perform specified?
❑ Is the data used in each task and the data resulting from each task specified?
Specific Nonfunctional (Quality) Requirements
❑ Is the expected response time, from the user’s point of view, specified for
all necessary operations?
❑ Are other timing considerations specified, such as processing time, datatransfer
rate, and system throughput?
❑ Is the level of security specified?
❑ Is the reliability specified, including the consequences of software failure,
the vital information that needs to be protected from failure, and the strategy
for error detection and recovery?
❑ Are minimum machine memory and free disk space specified?
❑ Is the maintainability of the system specified, including its ability to adapt
to changes in specific functionality, changes in the operating environment,
and changes in its interfaces with other software?
❑ Is the definition of success included? Of failure?
Requirements Quality
❑ Are the requirements written in the user’s language? Do the users think
so?
❑ Does each requirement avoid conflicts with other requirements?
❑ Are acceptable tradeoffs between competing attributes specified—for
example, between robustness and correctness?
❑ Do the requirements avoid specifying the design?
❑ Are the requirements at a fairly consistent level of detail? Should any
requirement be specified in more detail? Should any requirement be specified
in less detail?
❑ Are the requirements clear enough to be turned over to an independent
group for construction and still be understood? Do the developers think
so?
❑ Is each item relevant to the problem and its solution? Can each item be
traced to its origin in the problem environment?
❑ Is each requirement testable? Will it be possible for independent testing to
determine whether each requirement has been satisfied?
❑ Are all possible changes to the requirements specified, including the likelihood
of each change?
Requirements Completeness
❑ Where information isn’t available before development begins, are the
areas of incompleteness specified?
❑ Are the requirements complete in the sense that if the product satisfies
every requirement, it will be acceptable?
❑ Are you comfortable with all the requirements? Have you eliminated
requirements that are impossible to implement and included just to
appease your customer or your boss?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Programming Capstone Proposal Project
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!