Professional Identity and Stewardship
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Professional Identity and Stewardship
LEADERSHIP INTERVIEW Peer 2 1
LEADERSHIP INTERVIEW 2
Leadership Interview Part 2
Unknown Student
Grand Canyon University: AMP 450
XXXXXX, 2018
Professional Identity and Stewardship
Professional identity and stewardship are important components in the health care industry. There are many roles within health care, one being a leadership role. The views of a leader are similar to those of a team member, however they differ slightly. This difference can be attributed to the shift in mentality and focus when one takes on the leadership role. Although there are slight differences in ways of thinking, the overall beliefs and views of an individual in a leadership role compared to a peer are very similar.
Role as a Health Care Team Member
Leaders are an important part of any organization. In health care the leadership role can vary from one area to another. In the acute care setting Clinical Supervisors are an important leadership role. XXXXXX is a Clinical Supervisor on an acute care floor for pediatric patients. Ms. XXXXX describes her position as a Clinical Supervisor as a leadership role in which she is able to aid with patient care, as well as encourage growth and development of her team (A. XXXX, personal interview, Feb. 21, 2018). A typical night for a clinical supervisor includes aiding staff when needed, creating patient assignments for the next shift, productivity reports and handling any issues that may arise. Ms. XXXX has functioned in this role for a year and was previously a staff nurse and charge relief on the unit she currently works on. “I believe being part of the same unit, now in a leadership role, has given me insight to the needs of my team and unit (A. XXXXX, personal interview, Feb. 21, 2018).” Ms. Linehan states that this leadership role has allowed her to aid staff members in the development of their knowledge and skills as well as create changes on the unit to make it better for patients and staff (A. XXXXX, personal interview, Feb. 21, 2018).
Professionalism
Ms. XXXXX described professionalism as a combination of several attributes including knowledge and skills, appearance, attitude, behavior as well as others (A.XXXXX, personal interview, Feb. 21, 2018). Ms. XXXXX states that professionalism is not only being knowledgeable in a certain field but also being punctual, dressed appropriately and considerate of those around you (A. XXXX, personal interview, Feb. 21, 2018). Health care workers interact with individuals from all walks of life, being professional includes accepting and honoring the differences in everyone.
Steward of Health Care
“Being a steward of health care, to me means being open minded to change and encouraging those who I influence to bring change to health care. It means to encourage lifelong learning and maintain a high standard for patient care (A. XXXX, personal interview, Feb. 21, 2018).” Ms. XXXXX states she sees herself as a steward of health care in the sense that she is always continuing to learn and encourage those around her to do the same. She encourages employees who are furthering their education to bring their knowledge and evidence based practice projects to the unit. Ms. XXXX participates in regular continuing education classes and encourages her team members to do the same (A. XXXX, personal interview, Feb. 21, 2018).
Leadership
Ms.XXXXX, personal interview, Feb. 21, 2018).” An important characteristic that leaders possess is authenticity. Ms. Linehan believes that if she can be authentic with her team members it will lead to a better working relationship, creating trust and understanding between her and her team members (A. Linehan, personal interview, Feb. 21, 2018). “I want to be the type of leader whose team members feel comfortable approaching when there is an issue, I believe being authentic is a part of building that relationship and trust (A. XXXXX, personal interview, Feb. 21, 2018).” Ms. XXXXX wants to influence her team members by encouraging them to seek out opportunities to grow and develop their skills and knowledge.
Peer VS Leader
When comparing the interview answers from someone in a leadership role vs the answers from a peer there are some subtle differences. Ms. XXXXX’s responses, being in a leadership role were more focused on her view of herself as a leader and the type of leader she is. Ms. XXXX responses focus largely on the development of her team and less on patient care. While patient care is still an important part of Ms. XXXXX’s role, in regards to questions about leadership her answers focus on her team. XXXXXX 2, was interviewed as a peer, and her responses are more centered on what she expects out of leadership and focus on patient care (J. XXXXXt, personal interview, Feb. 20, 2018). The responses from Ms. XXXXXX focus on a bigger picture, her team. She focuses on what she can do to better patient care and her team. The expectations Ms. XXXXX had of a leader are similar to the attributes Ms. XXXXX uses to describe herself. The overall beliefs of professionalism and important characteristics of a leader are consistent between the two interviews.
References
AAAAA, A. (2018, February 21). Personal interview.
BBBBBB, J. (2018, February 20). Personal interview.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!