Professional Baseball Team Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Professional Baseball Team Case Study
Your Role and the Organization You are the Vice President of Human Resources for a professional baseball team that competes in a league with 30 franchises across 25 cities in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Each team operates as an independent business but is governed by a central league office. The league is highly competitive and teams battle over many of the same resources including personnel, media attention, some marketing revenues, and, at times, a shared customer base. While franchises compete against one another, there is centralized cooperation to ensure competitive balance. The average annual revenue per franchise has risen consistently for each of the past 15 years and now averages $150 million per franchise per year. The competitive season runs from April through September, culminating with a championship in October for those teams reaching the playoffs. While the franchises are extremely busy during the competitive season, there is also plenty of work to be done between November and March. Thus, the industry operates on a 12-month cycle. The organizational structure for on-field personnel is consistent across franchises, but it varies by team in the staff functions. Only 10 franchises have HR strategist positions, and only recently has that position featured vice president–level work. Generally, franchises employ between 125–300 staff, excluding on-field personnel. The Request on August 2 Your team’s board chair calls you to a confidential meeting and informs you that the president will be retiring at the end of the season. This is the first time you have heard about a change at the presidential level. Approximately six franchises (20%) replace their president each year, so while this is not an uncommon occurrence it is a critical change within the organization. Understanding the Team President Job, it is essential to define a job before recruiting or selecting for it. This helps HR professionals to establish criteria to evaluate candidates applying for the job (SIOP, 2003). Job definition should be linked to organizational success. So, job definition centers around an analysis of the organizational work provided through the job. By defining the job through an analysis of the core work, you can measure success based on the criteria that are deemed relevant to success in that job. A good process to follow for gaining an understanding of a job is to collect information from multiple sources and integrate that information. When possible, the sources should represent both quantitative and qualitative information. In fact, there are usually many sources available to help in understanding a particular job. The Occupational Information Network (O*Net), http://online.onetcenter.org, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Labor, is an example of a job information classification system based on surveys of workers currently in the occupation. By collecting information from many organizations, O*Net job information is generic—which can be an advantage or a disadvantage, depending on what you are trying to accomplish. O*Net information includes experience, worker and occupation requirements, worker and occupation characteristics, and occupation specific information. As an example of O*Net information that might be helpful in understanding the franchise president job, O*Net summarizes the franchise president’s role as follows: “Determine and formulate policies and provide the overall direction of companies or private and public sector organizations within the guidelines set up by a board of directors or similar governing body. Plan, direct or coordinate operational activities at the highest level of management with the help of subordinate executives and staff managers.” Existing job descriptions can demonstrate the complexity associated with a job. Job descriptions describe the critical features of a job, including the major functions or duties (Pritchard, 2002). Thus, job descriptions are a great source to understand a job. While some organizations have job descriptions for all levels, it should be noted that other organizations do not have formal job descriptions for president or CEO positions. Competitive Advantage Selecting a top executive can be crucial to an organization’s competitive advantage. Over time, top leadership can influence an organization in a number of ways. Some of the outcomes heavily influenced by a president might include how a budget is spent, profit margins and/or stock prices (Day & Lord, 1988; Lieberson & O’Connor, 1972; Weiner & Mahoney, 1977; Smith, Carson & Alexander, 1984). It is not solely the selection of a president that influences these outcomes, but rather the selection of a president who possesses the needed leadership abilities. Additionally, the president has to fi t with your organization—the president should either be qualified for your organizational culture or be hired to change the culture. In the baseball industry, typical outcome variables might include profit, winning championships, winning percentage, attendance and marketing success. Other outcome variables may also be appropriate to the industry or to a specific organization. REQUIRED – Based on the case provided above and the material contained in the supplemental REQUIRED READING regarding succession planning, answer the following questions in detail. Your submission must be at least 500 words in length excluding a repeat of the questions and any references (……yes, that means your answers to all six questions should total 500 words in length!).
What are the main issues in the case?
Describe the information needed that would be most useful in forming a recommendation for this particular case.
Describe possible courses of action for resolving the issues in the case, and the pros and cons of each.
What creative approaches could be used to help understand the franchise president job? Which resources do you think would be perceived by the client as most credible in understanding the job?
Think about other industries. How do presidents and CEOs in those industries help their organizations achieve a competitive advantage? What outcomes are different in those industries?
As an internal consultant, what secondary issues might you be concerned with as you become involved in this project? Exercise excerpted from Weingarden, S. (2008). Top Choice: A Case Study in Succession Management.
Professional Baseball Team Case Study
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!