Order ID | 53563633773 |
Type | Essay |
Writer Level | Masters |
Style | APA |
Sources/References | 4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order | 5-10 Pages |
Processes Of Transforming Nature Into Commodities
Topic: Coffee, labor, climate
Paper details: The development of capitalism depends on the processes of transforming nature into commodities to produce and trade. This process can have profound political, economic, social and ecological implications. Tea was a traditional drink in Asia with countless varieties defined by local microclimate and consumption patterns, but it was made into a standard commodity to trade around the world with the brand name such as Lipton. Wars and revolutions were fought over tea with great social/environmental consequences. Banana, also originated in tropical Asia with many varieties, was transformed into a single genetically modified variety-Cavendish for all American and most of the world’s consumers. Banana plantations transformed the Caribbean landscape and had been the backbone economy of many islands. Bananas led to civil wars and dictator regimes in numerous countries and gave rise to some of the largest global multinational corporations. Sugar, used to be an expensive condiment for an elite diet, became the common commodity and the basis of the colonial economies in many parts of the New World, as well as far off islands from Hawaii to Mauritius. There are many such examples: coffee, cotton, rubber, corn, oil, or nowadays even carbon. More commodities are being made daily with new technology such as Lithium (Koerner) which powered the battery for electronic cars. Cronon (1992, 266) said in his book Nature’s Metropolis in the transformation of Midwest USA: “Bisons and pine trees had once been members of ecosystems defined mainly flows of energy and nutrients and by relations among neighboring organisms. Rearrayed within the second nature of the market, they become commodities: things priced, bought, and sold within a system of human exchange. From that exchange flowed many others. Sudden new imperatives revalued the organisms that lived upon the land. Some, like the bison, bluestem, and pine tree, were priced so low that people consumed them in the most profligate ways and they disappeared, as significant elements of the regional landscape. Others, like wheat, corn cattle, and pigs, became the new dominant species of their carefully tended ecosystem, increasingly the abundance of species depended on its utility to the human economy: species thrived more by price than by direct ecological adaption. New system of value, radically different from their Indian predecessors, determined the fate of the entire ecosystem.” These efforts of transforming nature are the primary practice of capitalistic conquest of the natural world. As those natural product become commodities, Castree (1997) argues that they went through a capitalist production process and metabolized into “second nature” (p.2). Neil Smith (1984) called it “the production of nature:” “Nature is generally seen as precisely that which cannot be produced; it is an antithesis of human productive activity…. But with the progress of capital accumulation and the expansion of economic development, this material substratum is more and more the product of social production, and the dominant axes of differentiation are increasingly societal in origin.” (p. 368). Huber uses the term a “system of provision”-technology, culture and political-economic arrangement (p. xix) that make oil the central fuel for the American Way of Life. Interestingly, as consumers, we are often kept in the dark or are made to be oblivious to the process of manufacturing of such natural product, and the implications of its production and consumption. In this project, you will choose a commodity and write an essay to tell its story and explore the multiple implications of the production of nature. The format may vary, but keep in mind that you need to address the changes of several sets of social relationships surrounding this commodity, and link it with theoretical concept of production of nature as explained by Coe’s chapter. If nature is produced, then the questions become how it is produced and who controlled the process, or “system of provision” and why. The followings are some of the key aspects that you should address, but you do not have to address them separately nor in the following order. Depending on the commodity you choose, you may also emphasize one aspect of such commodities, and give a brief explanation of other aspects. 1. Relationship to nature: how does commodity A differ from A in a natural state? What have been the changes in the physical attributes of this product in order for it to become a commodity? What functions were lost and what functions were gained? What are the specific historical and geographical contexts for its transformation? 2. Technology: what types of technology are needed to enable the transformation, including producing, processing and distribution? Who controls the technology? What are the environmental implications? 3. What types of economic organizations are needed to carry out the production and distribution of such commodity: large corporations or small decentralized establishments? Is the government important? What about multinational organizations? 4. What are some of the power relations among different social groups implicated in the production and consumption of this commodity? labor, ownership, people in developed countries and developing countries, producers and consumers? 5. Remember, all of above are not static, but are made and remade in historical process. How have such processes unfold, who have been the chief agents and how the historical circumstance gave rise to such changes. For any commodity, there is plenty you can write, but there are keys to making a good paper. The following are expectations; 1) Link your story with theoretical arguments outlined above. Please refer to at least one of the readings either in class or in the reference of this paper or work cited above. You need to base your arguments on such readings by substantiating the key points and/or offer criticism. 2) Provide support for your statements. No matter how strong your positions are, you are writing to convince others who may not intend to agree with you or do not have your knowledge. You should try to find evidence both from qualitative and quantitative information. 3) Insert one or more table/chart to summarize your quantitative information, if any. If you discuss changes in price or volume of production, it would be the easiest for others to understand if you put them into a table or chart, rather than just list them in the text (FAO datasite). Table(s) is useful for quantitative information, but can also be useful for qualitative ones (eg. our table for world economy). Try to include at least one table in this paper. 4) Do not overgeneralize beyond what you can prove. Economic geography emphasizes the variation of the contexts. It would be useful to point out the specific countries or regions that your findings are true and try not to make an unwarranted generalization across the globe. 5) The paper should be written clearly and with an identification structure of argument. It would be useful you introduce this structulryre at the introduction section.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDERCLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernowAlso, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Processes Of Transforming Nature Into Commodities