Principles and Interconnectedness of Public Policy Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Principles and Interconnectedness of Public Policy Essay
This course provides students with an understanding of principles and interconnectedness of public policy, law, and ethics and their implications for the criminal justice practitioner. Policy development and implementation, federal and state laws, and issues of ethics are addressed in a broad criminal justice context and in varying settings. The link between criminology theory and social policy is be explored. Students engage in a comprehensive examination of selected theories of crime causation and critique a wide range of public policies, informed by theory, designed to prevent and combat crime
Course Title: Crime and Public Policy
Final Paper
In the Final paper, each student will develop a new or novel policy initiative designed to improve/reform one non-police aspect of the criminal justice system (i.e., federal, state or local issue). The policy initiative must be connected to a national, state or local effort to address a compelling criminal justice interest (policy, practice, outcome) that is fundamentally unfair to a segment of justice system consumers. Students will describe the major ideological, political, and/or ethical dimensions (as applicable) of the policy issue and develop recommended actions that, in their judgment, would improve outcomes/equity for the intended constituency. The recommended actions should be in the form of changes in thinking, practice, policy, law, or regulations. The paper will be five complete pages, doubled spaced, justified left in 12-point Times New Roman font. Please use APA format for in-text citations and Reference page entries. The Cover page, Table of Contents page, Reference page and optional Appendix page(s) shall not be included in reaching the five-page requirement. The section headings for numbers 1,2, 7 and 8 below shall be centered and bold. The section headings for numbers 3, 4, 6 and 6 below shall be left justified and bold. No photographs, charts, tables, or other visual displays will be included in the body of the paper. These items may be displayed on an Appendix page. No running headers are permitted.
The paper must reflect the following specifications:
- Cover page
- Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Identify the topic of your paper, tell the reader why it is relevant/important in the context of criminal justice practice or reform, identify intended constituents, preview major components of your paper
- New or Novel Policy Initiative
- Summarize your new or novel policy initiativecreated to improve/reform one aspect of the criminal justice process. Why is it needed and who is it designed to help?
- Obstacles to Implementation
- Identify the major ideological, political, financial and/or ethical issues you are likely to encounter in the implementation of your policy and briefly describe the process you will use to overcome said challenges
- Conclusion (provide a one paragraph summary of your entire paper)
- References used in the paper
- minimum of five scholarly references required
- Appendix (optional)
December 20th Last day to submit Final Papers
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!