principal components of an effective performance appraisal system
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
principal components of an effective performance appraisal system
Review the video “ The Performance Review Process ” then answer the following two questions using the question and answer (Q&A) format; in other words, include the original question along with your response.
Within your post, support your responses with information from at least one peer-reviewed/scholarly source (not older than 3-5 years) from CSU-Global online library or the Internet, and provide the full citation at the end. Use APA guidelines to format your references.
- What are the principal components of an effective performance appraisal system?
- How can a performance appraisal system effectively address employee-related challenges in the workplace such as performance problems, unsatisfactory conduct, and/or violations of policies?
This is the video transcript of video
– Suppose you’re an employee who’s just been told by your boss that it’s time for your annual review. Suddenly, you’re overcome with a deep sense of dread and foreboding. You think you’ve had a pretty good year but suppose the boss doesn’t see things the way you do.More importantly, how will the boss’s judgment affect the pay raise you’re expecting? If pay for performance means anything, it means that there needs to be some judgment by a person in authority about your performance so they can tie that judgment to decisions about pay.
So I want to help you understand how organizations link pay to performance through performance reviews. In the US, about 90% of all organizations use performance reviews as a basis for pay decisions yet over the last decade, there have been vast changes in how reviews are done and how frequently they are done. At a general level, reviews serve as a basis for management decisions such as whom to promote, whom to let go or how to make adjustments in pay and to provide constructive feedback to help employees improve their performance.
Some organizations make performance reviews an annual event. However, when they do that, it’s impossible to separate discussions about professional growth and development from discussions about pay adjustments. Employees tend to focus on the pay adjustments and often get defensive when the boss says anything negative about their performance. Today, we recognize that performance reviews for pay purposes are part of a larger, more frequent process of performance management.
Just like coaching in sports, the objective of performance management is to offer feedback about your performance to help you get better.Many companies have moved to more frequent check-ins, daily, weekly or monthly so that there are no surprises. If there are no surprises during employees’ pay reviews then there’s little reason to get defensive. The discussion can focus exclusively on the reasons for the decision about your pay.
There are practical advantages for managers to provide more frequent feedback including higher employee retention, higher customer satisfaction, higher levels of employee commitment and increased profits. Okay, by now you’re probably asking yourself, if I’m the boss,what’s the best format for rating performance? Should I use objective data, subjective data or both? In some jobs like that of receptionist, you may not have a choice.
Intangibles make the difference between poor, average and superior performance. Qualities like courtesy when greeting clients and answering phones, initiative in solving problems without running to the boss and dependability under deadlines are crucial. Other jobs like sales lend themselves to more objective measures. The key consideration is relevance. Rate your employees on the things that really make a difference between success and failure in their jobs.
If employees really believe your feedback will help them do their jobs better, they’re more willing to put your suggestions into practice.Include specific examples to support your ratings and be able to explain them to your superiors as well as to your direct reports. If there are no surprises in the review process then there’s no reason for employees to react with dread when the time comes to adjust their pay.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!