PPT & Worksheet for Decision Making Literacy
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Teachers must observe and analyze student learning over time in order to make data-driven decisions. When demonstrating your skills as a reading/literacy specialist, it’s important to show how you collaborate with others to provide literacy intervention support to students.
Make a digital presentation with 12-15 slides to show off your Literacy Work Sample. In Topic 6, you will present this to your mentor and mentee.
The following topics should be covered in the presentation:
Effective strategies for collaborating with the mentor during decision-making to evaluate and align instructional practices and interventions within and across classrooms.
Effective mentor collaboration strategies for designing and aligning instructional practices and interventions within and across classrooms.
Differentiating instructional approaches and practices to meet the diverse literacy needs of individuals and groups of students.
Effective strategies for developing, implementing, and evaluating literacy instructional practices and curriculum with the mentee.
How tracking was used to boost student self-efficacy and engagement.
In light of current research, policy, and practice, the method you used to reflect on your personal practice as a reading/literacy specialist.
The title slide, the reference slide, and the presenter’s notes are all included.
Graphics that are relevant to the content, visually appealing, and use space effectively should be included in the digital presentation.
Use 2-3 scholarly resources to back up your presentation.
BONUS PART:
It doesn’t have to be difficult to collect and analyze student data. Teachers can efficiently gather and use student data to guide instruction and assessment decisions by using the right data tracking tools. Providing students with the ability to track their own progress can also help them feel more motivated and achieve more.
To support this field experience, set aside at least 12.5 hours in the field. The candidate has complete discretion in determining how to best use the 12.5 practicum hours to balance assignment requirements while working with both a mentor and a mentee. It may differ from one topic to the next in order to meet all of the assignment’s requirements.
Collaborate with your mentor to adjust the final intervention from your Topic 3 literacy intervention plan using the data from the formative assessment implemented in Topic 4. Develop an activity that expands students’ knowledge of the literacy standard if the small group of students has met it. Implement the final intervention or activity, as well as any necessary changes to the tracking system you created for your small group of students.
Develop a summative assessment based on the intervention data with your mentor. The assessment should be aligned with the literacy standard and provide students with multiple options for demonstrating their learning. Implement the assessment with a small group of students and provide feedback to keep track of their progress.
Discuss the following with your mentor:
Is your tracking system simple and quick to use?
Is your tracking appropriate for your teaching style?
Is the tracking system relevant to the students, and have they used it on a regular basis?
Is the literacy goal being met by the students?
Was the assessment accurate in assessing student learning? Were students more successful when they had more options for demonstrating their learning?
What are the next steps in consolidating or expanding students’ literacy knowledge?
Explain how you collaborated with your mentor to develop, implement, and evaluate literacy instructional practices, curriculum, tracking methods, and assessments in the Mentor Tracking Summary section of the LWS.
Mentoring (Part 2)
Discuss the results of the formative assessment conducted with the small group of students with the mentee. Assist your mentee in tracking and providing feedback to their students using the knowledge you gained from your tracking process. Work with your mentee to identify additional student needs and next steps in their intervention. Fill in the blanks on the “Mentee Discussion Summary.”
Provide literacy instruction and support during any remaining field experience hours.
Write 250-500 words in the Reflection section of the LWS about your own practice as a reading/literacy specialist in relation to decision-making in light of current research, policy, and practice.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!