PowerPoint Presentation on PESTLE Analysis
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
PowerPoint Presentation on PESTLE Analysis
The main areas in which hospitals are aiming to improve are access to treatment, quality of care, and cost of care. The cost of health care and the funding of health care results in a national health care expenditure, which must be investigated, as well as payment sources. Quality issues are intrinsically related to health care expenditures, hence quality initiatives are tied to health care spending.
The National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Office of the Actuary, the National Health Statistics Group, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) publish annual reports on national health expenditures (NHE) and trends (CMS). The expenditures are reported and tracked over time using a standard format that indicates both private and governmental funding sources, as well as the expense items. Annual reports are published two years after the reporting period has ended. In the textbook, see Table 8-1.
NHE accounted for more than 3.0 trillion dollars in 2014, or 17.5 percent of GDP, equating to about $9,523 per person (see Figure 8-1). The cost of health care is influenced by a number of interconnected factors. The aging population, new pharmaceuticals and medical and diagnostic technology, a focus on specialty medicine, huge numbers of uninsured and underinsured people, volume-based reimbursement incentives, and labor intensity are all factors to consider.
Scenario
You receive a call from the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of We Care Hospital, requesting that the two of you collaborate on a health-care spending initiative. The first step is to perform a PESTLE analysis. Investigate current happenings in the macro world using Critical Thinking Skills and Metacognition. Then, using a PESTLE analysis, create a 10-slide narrative in Microsoft PowerPoint. Political, economic, social, technical, legal, and environmental issues are all identified in a PESTLE Analysis.Instructions
This is the format for your 10-slide PESTLE PowerPoint:The first slide is the cover page.
Include your name, the title of your presentation, the course number and title, the name of your professor, and the date.
Background or Executive Summary (Slide 2)
Describe the incident in detail. When writing brief sentences, use bullets. Executive Summary should be the title of these slides.
Thesis Statement (Slide 3)
Determine the focus of your investigation. Thesis Statement should be the headline of this slide.
Support (Slides 49)
State, Explain, Support, and Conclude your thesis statement using the SESC methodology.
Within the last five years, you should include at least three court cases and relevant peer-reviewed studies.
References (slide 10)
Strayer Writing Standards are required for this course. Please see the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course for help and information. Any additional instructions should be sought from your lecturer.Note: Writing Resources, such as Strayer University’s Writing Center, Tutor.com, and Grammarly.com, are also available on your course’s left-hand menu.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!