Positives and Negatives about the Garda Loan
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Positives and Negatives about the Garda Loan
- Determine whether or not the bank should make the loan and discuss the reasoning behind your recommendation (select only one of the two alternatives below)
Hellenic National Bank has decided in favor of the loan request to Garda Investment Associates, Ltd. for the construction and development phase and mini permanent financing of the strip shopping center in Romania. In recognition of the growth opportunities in Eastern Europe, the bank has established a representative branch in Bucharest, Romania which will help service the request with the Boston-based institution. However, the loan will be booked in the United States and denominated in U.S. dollars. This will create an additional opportunity to capitalize on the depreciation of the Romanian currency.
The construction and development of the shopping center is expected to take 15 months to complete at a (dollar-equivalent) cost of $3,928,250 including interest. Monthly payments against the mini perm financing may run at $27,141 based upon a 25 year amortization and a 6.75 percent fixed rate, with a balloon payment due in 5 years. The balloon payment of $2,299,790 will then be funded by a takeout commitment in the form of a 15-year mortgage loan from a German pension fund(see calculations below).
Based on our analysis, Garda has submitted all the necessary documentation for the loan request. The documentation includes the credit enhancements used to determine whether to underwrite the real estate loan such as surveys, permits, insurance, contractors’ completion bond, and an environment impact study. The performance bond is written by an insurance company on behalf of the building contractor to construct the strip shopping center in the case where project completion is not guaranteed and takes longer to complete than expected. In addition, Garda has included lease commitments from the tenants in this package which has been crucial to support our decision in favor of the loan request.
In our financial analysis to approve the Garda loan request, we needed to determine whether the income generated from the strip shopping center would adequately service principal and interest on the debt. This is measured through the “debt service coverage” ratio. As stated in the case, net operating income in 2020 and 2021 is $499,172 and $540,645, respectively. If growth continues to be at 8% as the pro forma income statement given in the case suggest, our analysis suggests that debt service coverage is likely to continue to improve(See chart below).
- Identify at least three positives and three negatives about the Garda loan request(present these points in the form of bullet statements or phrases).
Positive:
- The borrower has a solid professional knowledge of the business with twenty years of real estate development and management experience, and a current relationship with the Miami office of the Hellenic Bank which helped finance several of his commercial real estate projects in Florida.
- The economic slowdown provided opportunities such lower cost of labor, drop in real estate value, so land was bought and paid off “free and clear” by Garda, and cost of development and investment was also lower. Furthermore, the depreciated value of the Romanian Currency created opportunity for additional savings if the financing could be sourced abroad (e.g. USD).
- The borrower provided all necessary research from independent parties and project expertise professionals. It submitted a file to Hellenic National Bank including all necessary documentation and report information. In turn, the bank hired an independent engineer to evaluate the project and the engineering report supported the Borrower’s data.
Negative:
- Romania is experiencing a slowdown in economic activity and sizeable increase in unemployment. Such factors could affect the business of the shopping mall resulting in less than forecasted cash flow.
- These types of projects Garda Investment Associates are planning to develop are considerably risky, especially in a scenario of an economic slowdown. The OCC CRE Lending handbook states this as Credit Risk. Often times developers fail to complete the project or delay it greatly affecting the borrower’s ability to generate income at the planned time, and therefore forcing the bank to take remediation measures to collect.
- Project proximity with another
- How any potential borrower requesting the same type of credit may manage exposure to interest rate risk? Identify the alternate tools available to management.
Forex Contract
Option Hedge
Money Market
SOURCES
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!