Polynomial Identities and Proofs Advertisement Essay Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Polynomial Identities and Proofs Advertisement Essay Paper
You are going to design an advertisement for a new polynomial identity that you are going to invent. Your goal for this activity is to demonstrate the proof of your polynomial identity through an algebraic proof and a numerical proof in an engaging way! Make it so the whole world wants to purchase your polynomial identity and can’t imagine living without it!
You may do this by making a flier, a newspaper or magazine advertisement, making an infomercial video or audio recording, or designing a visual presentation for investors through a flowchart or PowerPoint.
You must:
Label and display your new polynomial identity
Prove that it is true through an algebraic proof, identifying each step
Demonstrate that your polynomial identity works on numerical relationships
Warning! No identities used in the lesson may be submitted. Create your own using the columns below. See what happens when different binomials or trinomials are combined. Square one factor from column A and add it to one factor from column B to develop your own identity.
Column A Column B
(x − y) (x^2 + 2xy + y^2)
(x + y) (x^2 − 2xy + y^2)
(y + x) (ax + b)
(y − x) ( (cy + d)
Net Present Value Project Worksheet Assignment Essay
Starliper Industries has developed a project to produce a new product: Widgets. To develop the widgets, Starliper Industries needs to purchase a new machine that will help develop the widgets. Starliper Industries is deciding between two different machines, “New Tech” and “Standard Classic” that have the capabilities necessary to develop the widgets. Your job will be to compare the two different machines using net present value. The company has produced the following information regarding the widgets and the two machines:
The cost to purchase “New Tech” will be $421,000 and will have a useful life of 6 years; “New Tech” will have a salvage value of $26,000 at the end of 6 years. Annual straight-line depreciation is $65,833.[1] The cost to purchase “Standard Classic” will be $250,000 and will also have a useful life of 6 years; “Standard Classic” will have a salvage value of $15,000 at the end of 6 years. Annual straight-line depreciation is $39,167.[2]
Total Contribution Margin from the sale of Widgets will be different for each machine because the “Standard Classic” machine requires more variable manufacturing overhead costs. The expected contribution margin if the “New Tech” machine is chosen is the following:
Year Total Contribution Margin 1 $300,000 2 $315,000 3 $380,000 4-6 $440,000 The contribution margin if the “Standard Classic” is chosen is expected to be the following:
Year Total Contribution Margin 1 $275,000 2 $290,000 3 $375,000 4-6 $420,000 Working Capital of $95,000 will be required at the beginning of the production of Widgets for the “New Tech” machine, and working capital of $53,000 will be required at the beginning of the production of Widgets for the “Standard Classic” machine. For both machines the working capital will be released at the end of the project (i.e., end of year 6).
The yearly cost of machine maintenance will be $50,000 for the “New Tech” and will be $72,000 for the “Standard Classic” machine.
Other fixed costs for salaries, and insurance, which will be the same regardless of the machine chosen, will be the following:
Year Total Other Fixed Costs 1-2 $160,000 3 $150,000 4-6 $120,000 The “Standard Classic” machine will require a major overhaul that will cost $110,000 at the end of year 3 of the project. This will not apply to the “New Tech” machine. This overhaul is treated as an operating expense on the income statement.
The Required Rate of Return for Starliper Industries is 11%.
Starliper Industries’ tax rate is 22%
Use the “Total-Cost Approach”, which is that all cash flows should be included in the evaluation of net present value, not just the cash flows that are different between the two choices.
Required:
Use the “NPV Project Template” Excel file on Blackboard in the Project 2 folder on Blackboard.
The cells you are required to fill are the cells in the “Net Present Value Analysis” box in both the “New Tech” and “Standard Classic” tabs.
The “Net Present Value” cell must be filled
The “Project Profitability Index” cell must be filled
The cells outside of the “Net Present Value Analysis” box are for your convenience but will not be graded.
You must use special Excel formulas to calculate Net Present Value
You may use the Present Value (pv) formula method to find the present value of the cash flows of each individual year (use cell row “Discounted CF (Optional)” for this method)
Alternatively, you may use the Net Present Value (NPV) formula method.
You do not have to utilize both methods (although it may provide a nice check). You will not receive bonus points for doing both methods
GRADED: Submit your Excel template to the Blackboard assignment “Project 2 Submission” in the Project 2 folder on Blackboard.
Do not alter the structure of the template
*In the “Comments” section on the submission page, state which machine you believe Starliper Industries should purchase and a short explanation backing that decision.*
Rubric:
Correct Net Present Values for the two machines: 30
Correct use of a special excel formula: 15
Well-reasoned response regarding choice of machine: 10
Correct values in “Net Present Value Analysis” box in template: 20 total points
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!