Order ID | 53563633773 |
Type | Essay |
Writer Level | Masters |
Style | APA |
Sources/References | 4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order | 5-10 Pages |
Please Reply to the following 2 Discussion posts:
Requirement
APA format with intext citation
Word count minimum of 150 words per post, not including references
References at least one high-level scholarly reference per post within the last 5 years in APA format.
Plagiarism free.
Turnitin receipt.
DISCUSSION POST # 1 Reply to Reesha
Currently at this point in my clinical journey the closest I have gotten to telemedicine is going over recent lab results, diagnostic tests findings, and refilling appropriate medications, all through phone visits with patients. Personally I have not experienced 1:1 video calls with patients at my clinical sites at this time. Telemedicine is a new adaptive way healthcare providers interact with their patients through technology. It is a revolutionary way in which patients can have access to healthcare from a remote location. “According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services(CMS)1 ,Telemedicine is ‘a service that seeks to improve a patient’s health by permitting two-way, real-time interactive communication between the patient and the physician at a distant site’” (Kichloo et al., 2020). There are some great pros and cons when it comes to telemedicine. It goes without saying that during the COVID-19 pandemic having an opportunity to communicate with your medical provider in a safe manner is unarguably a blessing. In times where it could be seen as unsafe to have providers within 6 feet of patients and vice versa, the fact that patients could still receive care and that they could be seen by their primary physician or provider is a great asset for them. It created a way for healthcare to become more accessible and affordable. Some cons of telemedicine and how it can affect nurse practitioners is the disadvantage of not being able to encounter their patients in person. Obviously as a healthcare provider it is more fitting to actually see, touch, and hear the patients that you are treating. These elements play a vital role when it comes to diagnosis, treatments, and overall plan of care. Assessments and proper care is hindered when these aspects of a patient’s visit are not available when necessary. In this way it is limited but of course treatment will not be initiated unless properly evidenced. In this way, telemedicine is not overtaking patients’ visits in a way that replaces healthcare providers actually assessing their patients. So in the midst of impaired access to quality healthcare, I believe that telemedicine is a great option in situations deemed necessary. It has improved patient outcomes by being an outlet for healthcare in times where it was not possible for patients to meet face to face. Non emergent situations can be handled and patients can acquire the care they need. It has done more good than harm and should be a continued source for access to healthcare.
Please Reply To The Following 2 Discussion Posts:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDERCLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernowAlso, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|