Phishing
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Phishing attacks are a prevalent and continually evolving form of cybercrime that targets individuals and organizations with deceptive tactics to steal sensitive information, such as login credentials, financial data, or personal information. These attacks often employ social engineering techniques to manipulate victims into divulging confidential information or performing actions that compromise security. There are various phishing attack types, each with distinct characteristics and objectives. In this essay, we will explore some of the most common phishing attack types.
- **Spear Phishing:**
Spear phishing attacks are highly targeted. Cybercriminals conduct extensive research on their victims, crafting customized messages that appear legitimate. These messages often mimic emails from trusted sources, like colleagues or superiors, to trick individuals into revealing sensitive data or downloading malicious attachments.
- **Pharming:**
Pharming attacks manipulate the Domain Name System (DNS) to redirect users to fraudulent websites. Victims are lured into believing they are on a legitimate site, such as a banking portal, when, in reality, they are on a fake page designed to steal their login credentials or financial information.
- **Vishing:**
Vishing, or voice phishing, involves attackers using phone calls to impersonate trusted entities, like bank representatives or tech support. They aim to extract personal or financial information over the phone. This type of phishing exploits human trust in voice communication.
- **Smishing:**
Smishing combines SMS (text messaging) with phishing. Victims receive text messages that appear to be from legitimate sources, often with links to malicious websites or instructions to reply with sensitive information.
- **Clone Phishing:**
In clone phishing, attackers clone legitimate emails, making slight modifications to the content or links to deceive recipients. These modified emails seem genuine and are sent from what appears to be a trusted source.
- **Whaling or CEO Fraud:**
Whaling targets high-profile individuals within an organization, such as CEOs or top executives. Attackers impersonate these individuals to request sensitive data or initiate fraudulent transactions, relying on the authority and trust associated with their positions.
- **Credential Harvesting:**
This type of phishing involves tricking victims into providing their login credentials by posing as legitimate websites or services. Attackers then use these credentials to gain unauthorized access to accounts.
- **Angler Phishing:**
Angler phishing takes advantage of the popularity of social media and other online platforms. Attackers create fake profiles or impersonate legitimate users to exploit trust and gather personal information or spread malware.
- **Ransom Phishing:**
Ransom phishing involves sending victims emails or messages claiming that their data or accounts have been compromised. The attackers demand a ransom payment to restore access or prevent the release of sensitive information, even if no actual breach occurred.
- **Search Engine Phishing:**
Cybercriminals create fake websites optimized for search engine results, so victims searching for specific information inadvertently land on these fraudulent sites. These websites often prompt users to enter personal information.
Phishing attacks continue to evolve, becoming more sophisticated and harder to detect. To mitigate the risks associated with these attacks, individuals and organizations must educate themselves about the various phishing attack types, implement robust cybersecurity measures, and maintain a vigilant attitude towards unsolicited communications. Cybersecurity training, multi-factor authentication, and advanced email filtering systems are some of the tools and practices that can help protect against the diverse and ever-changing landscape of phishing attacks.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |

|
 |
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!