Pfizer Case Study Viagra Development and Commercialization
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Case Studies: In an academic paper, look at how Viagra was developed and commercialized, and then back up your thesis (as outlined below) with relevant information from your readings and online research. In your paper, you should develop an argument that answers the following questions: How important were organizational processes to the drug’s success? How could Pfizer improve its innovation management in the future?
The case is on page 299 of Trott’s book. You’ll want to include some of the models from chapters 8 and 9 as well as the themes addressed by the case’s questions.Format of a Research Paper:
The above information was obtained from the college’s website. Building the Draft Essay
How to begin can be found on our library site: Library Self-Help: Research Skills and Concepts
It is estimated that the each paper will be 5 to 6 pages single spaced. Be sure to follow proper referencing format and include your full bibliography at the end of the paper.
Once you know what you want to talk about and you have written your thesis statement, you are prepared to construct the body of your essay The body of the paper, or paragraphs that develop the thesis by discussing your views and supporting them with examples or proof, will normally come after the thesis statement. This is, without a doubt, the most crucial component of the work, because it explains what you believe and why you believe it. (You can decide what you want to say in your introduction and conclusion after you’ve finished the body of your paper.)Alternatives to Development
You must back up your thesis with evidence for each reason or major point.
Remember to clarify your point properly and explain it in a new window. One helpful strategy is to reread your thesis line and consider what questions a reader could have about it. After that, respond to the questions by explaining and providing examples or evidence.
Show how one thing is similar to another and then how the two are distinct, highlighting the side that you think is more essential. If your thesis states, “Jazz is a significant art form,” you may compare and contrast a jazz and a classical work.
You may offer your reader what the opposition believesthat is, reasons why some individuals disagree with your thesisand then rebut those arguments by demonstrating why they are incorrect. If, on the other hand, you believe the opponent isn’t fully correct, you can say so, i.e., concede, but then explain why your argument remains correct.
Consider the order in which you presented your points. Why did you offer one rationale or important component of your thesis first, another second, and so on? If you don’t see any benefit in presenting your ideas in the order you have, think about it some more until you come up with a reason why the order you have is the best, or modify it to one that makes more sense to you.
Finally, as you work on the body of your dissertation, keep three questions in mind whenever you revisit your thesis. First, does each paragraph contribute to the development of my thesis? Second, have I completed all of the development that I desired? Third, and most importantly, am I still content with my working thesis, or has my body changed in such a manner that I need to adapt my thesis to reflect what I’ve learned, believe, and actually discussed?
Length of explanation and answer: 5 pages
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!