Personhood and Artificial Intelligence Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Personhood and Artificial Intelligence
AI and PersonhoodSaudi Arabia recently granted Sophia, a robot, the status of citizen. Read this article about Sophia and see her speak in front of a live audience in the video below. What conditions, given recent advances in the development of sophisticated AI, would you require for you to consider such AI to be ‘persons’? If you wouldn’t consider them people under any circumstances, explain why. Include a specific reference to one or both of the excerpts from John R. Searle on pages 355-356 of our text in your response. What is his take on AI as a person/potential person? NB: Students frequently post comments in this thread such as ‘AI will never be human’ or ‘no, I do not and will not consider AI to be human.’ BUT!!! It’s worth noting that we’re debating whether AI should be considered persons rather than humans. Clearly, being human necessitates having human DNA and other characteristics, so AI cannot be human. Make sure to keep your comments focused on AI’s potential personhood. Make sure to follow the instructions in the Discussion Forums in Unit 1: For making specific references to texts, videos, and podcasts, see the Protocol and Grading Criteria folder; posts that do not follow these instructions will not receive full credit. Works Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller, Chris Weller Meet the First-Ever Robot Citizen, Sophia, a Humanoid Who Once Threatened to ‘Destroy Humans.’ Business Insider, October 27, 2017. Meet Sophia, the robot citizen who threatened to “destroy humans” – Business Insider. On the 19th of August, 2020, I was able to get a hold of some information Interview with Sophia, the Lifelike Hot Robot. CNBC uploaded this video to YouTube on October 25, 2017. Full Interview With Sophia, The Lifelike Hot Robot | CNBC – YouTube On the 19th of August, 2020, I was able to get a hold of some information
Is It True That We Have Free Will?Is It True That We Have Free Will?
[Make sure you’ve read Section C of Chapter 7 before continuing with this thread.]
Baron d’Holbach presents the argument known as hard determinism in his book System of Nature (p. 446 in our text), which claims that free will does not exist and is an illusion. Give a 3- to 4-sentence summary of his argument that we don’t have free will for this discussion, and then respond to his argument. Also, watch the video below, in which philosopher and neuroscientist Sam Harris presents a thought experiment to demonstrate that free will does not exist, and then write about your reaction to it. Is Harris able to persuade you of his point of view? Why do you think that is? Finally, how can you defend your position if you believe you have free will? Students frequently assert “I have free will because I make choices” or “I have free will because I can do whatever I want” during this discussion. However, such responses fall prey to the begging of the question fallacy. Such claims essentially state, “I have free will because I have free will.” Attempt to avoid this fallacy in your response. Make sure to follow the instructions for making specific references to texts, videos, and podcasts in Unit 1 in the Discussion Forums: Protocol and Grading Criteria folder; posts that do not follow these instructions will not receive full credit.
Works Sam Harris Free Will Thought Experiment, YouTube, 4 Nov. 2018, uploaded by Critical Thoughts. YouTube – Sam Harris’s Free Will Thought Experiment. On the 4th of May, 2020, I was able to get a hold of
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!