Order ID | 53563633773 |
Type | Essay |
Writer Level | Masters |
Style | APA |
Sources/References | 4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order | 5-10 Pages |
Personality Theory Psychology Homework Help
PSY111 Personality Theory Project Rubric – 100 Points
Psychology- 2 pages
Part 1
What theory is the assessment you chose to take based on? Discuss the results of your test to show an understanding of the variables being assessed and the results.
Describe two specific events in your life that exemplify how your personality may have influenced your thoughts, behavior, and/or the outcome of the event. Include in your example mention of the terms or traits included in the personality assessment you completed. For example, if you scored very low or high on a particular trait, give an example of an (You can make up an experience to use in these two parts as long as it coincides with the results and the theory) experience that exemplifies that trait. Examples need to be concise, yet show understanding of the personality trait in question.
Part 2 – Examination of Personality Development
Considering your personality profile from the above assessment, which of the following theories most accurately explains your personality development: psychodynamic, humanistic, or cognitive-social? Briefly describe the theory and justify how this theory applies to your personality development. THE THEORY I WOULD LIKE TO USE IS SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY.
Copy of the Results from MY INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT as follows:
Big Five Test Results
Extroversion | |||||||||| | 32% |
Orderliness | |||||||||||| | 50% |
Emotional Stability | |||||||||||| | 44% |
Accommodation | |||||||||||||||||||| | 86% |
Inquisitiveness | |||||||||||||||| | 79% |
The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:
Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private. Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self-controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun. Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious. Accommodation results were very high which suggests you are overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense too often of your own individual development (martyr complex). Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical. |
The following is the grading Rubric:
Excellent/Exceeds Expectations | Good/Meets Most Expectations | Incomplete/Meets Partial Expectations | ||
Points Possible | 5 | 4 | 3-1 | POINTS EARNED = |
(5 points)
Part I a.) What is the underlying theory supporting the personality assessment you took? |
Correctly identifies the theory on which the assessment is based. Fully supports description that explains how this assessment is an example of the theory selected. | Correctly identifies the theory on which the assessment is based. Needs some additional detail to explain how this assessment is an example of the theory selected. | Attempts to identify the theory on which the assessment is based. May identify incorrect personality theory OR needs significant detail to support theory selected. | Feedback Comments: |
Points Possible | 20-19 | 18-15 | 14-1 | POINTS EARNED = |
(20 points)
b.) Discuss the results of your assessment to show an understanding of the variables being assessed and the results. |
Complete discussion of assessment results to show an understanding of theory and variables being assessed. Fully supports discussion. | Discusses assessment results to show an understanding of theory and most of the variables being assessed. Needs minor additional detail or support to be complete. | Partial discussion of assessment results. Demonstrates partial understanding of theory and variables being assessed. Needs significant detail or support to be complete. | Feedback Comments: |
Points Possible | 30-28 | 27-22 | 21-1 | POINTS EARNED = |
(30 points)
c.) Application of assessment: Describe two events that exemplify how personality influences thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Mention terms or traits from the personality assessment. |
Describes at least two events that exemplify how personality influences thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of event. Mentions the terms/traits in the personality assessment. Examples properly apply concepts from assessment/theory and show understanding of the personality trait in question. | Describes two events that exemplify how personality influenced thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Mentions some of the terms or traits from the personality assessment. Examples properly apply most concepts from assessment/theory and show some understanding of the personality trait in question. Needs minor additional detail to be complete. | Attempts to describe two events that exemplify how personality influenced thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Demonstrates partial application of the results throughout examples OR example(s) are not appropriate application of results. Needs significant detail or support to be complete. | Feedback Comments: |
Points Possible | 25-24 | 23-19 | 18-1 | POINTS EARNED = |
(25 points)
Part II. Describe which theory most accurately explains personality development psychodynamic, humanistic, or cognitive-social. Justifies how this theory applies to personality development. |
Demonstrates ability to describe and apply theory to explain personality variation and development across the lifespan. Justifies how the theory applies to and exemplifies personality development. Fully supports description. | Demonstrates some ability to describe and justify theory to explain personality variation and development across the lifespan. Needs minor additional detail or support. | Provides description of a personality theory and attempts to apply and justify how theory explains personality variation and development across the lifespan. Needs significant detail or support to be complete. | Feedback Comments: |
Excellent/Exceeds Expectations | Good/Meets Most Expectations | Incomplete/Meets Partial Expectations | ||
Points Possible | 10-9 | 8-7 | 6-1 | POINTS EARNED = |
(10 points)
Writing Mechanics sentence structure, run-ons, fragments, agreement, punctuation, capitalization, spelling, etc. |
Demonstrates knowledge and use of writing mechanics, enhances the readability | Demonstrates knowledge and use of writing mechanics but with errors that may detract from the readability | Difficulties with readability due to inappropriate use of writing mechanics | Feedback Comments: |
Points Possible | 10-9 | 8-7 | 6-1 | POINTS EARNED = |
(10 points)
Writing Organization Coherence: all writing fits together, makes sense, and flows in effective order – beginning, middle, end Clarity: all writing is consistent and logical |
Coherence: Well organized and purposeful writing; has beginning, middle, and end; strong and appropriate transitions
Clarity: Expresses ideas clearly and logically |
Coherence: Sequence of information difficult to follow; lacks a clear beginning, middle, and end; few or inappropriate transitions
Clarity: Attempts to express ideas clearly; sometimes difficult to follow |
Coherence: Unclear; lacks beginning, middle and end; fails to use transitions appropriately
Clarity: Disjointed connection of ideas; difficult to follow |
|
For each requirement not completed, points(s) will be deducted as explained below.
(Maximum Deduction 10 Points) |
POINTS DEDUCTED: | |||
Requirements for basic APA document formatting and citations
(Maximum Deduction 10 Points) |
Your assignment requires the following:
Name at top of document (-1 point) 1 inch margins (-1 point) Times/Times New Roman font (-1 point) 12 point font (-1 point) Double spaced (-1 point) Informal citations within the worksheet (-1 point) Informal list of references (-2 points) – Quotation marks when directly quoting a source (-2 points) |
Feedback Comments: | ||
FINAL SCORE: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDERCLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernowAlso, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|