Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
PERSONAL LITERACY PHILOSOPHY The International Literacy Association (2017) indicates that literacy leaders "demonstrate knowledge of the theoretical, historical, and evidence-based foundations of literacy and language and the ways in which they interrelate and the role of literacy professionals in schools" (Overarching Standard 1). For this assignment, you will present your personal philosophy of literacy based on theoretical, historical, and evidence-based knowledge by doing the following: Identify at least five strong beliefs that support your literacy philosophy. Base your personal philosophy on learning theories and literacy theories that shape your beliefs as a literacy leader. Describe the learning theory or theories that best support your philosophy and explain the literacy theory or theories that are logically connected to your learning theories. Write a short literature review regarding the characteristics of literacy programs or strategies that flow logically from your learning and literacy theories. Provide in-text citations for the sources that support your philosophy and thinking. Table of Contents Introduction……………………….…………………………………………………………………… Belief 1: (Insert Your Belief) …………….…………………………………………………………… Belief 2: (Insert Your Belief) …………………….…………………………………..………………. Belief 3: (Insert Your Belief) ………………………..……………………………………………….. Belief 4: (Insert Your Belief) ……………………………......……………..………………………… Belief 5: (Insert Your Belief) ………….……………………………………………………………… Conclusions ….………………………………….…………..………………………………………… References……………………………………………………………………………………………… Introduction In the introduction, direct the reader to the general purpose of your paper and why the purpose is important. Review the structure of your paper. Provide your unique critical synthesis regarding the topic of your paper. You may consider sharing your most salient learning and literacy philosophy. Write 1–3 paragraphs. (Remove the directions and grading criteria before submitting. Submit with black text.) Belief 1: (Insert Your Belief) Explain the details and implications of your belief. Use professional literature to form logical themes: Possible themes may include learning theory to which the belief is aligned, literacy theory to which the belief is linked, and strategy implications based on this belief. Set up these themes using a Level 2 heading. Belief 2: (Insert Your Belief) Explain the details and implications of your belief. Use professional literature to form logical themes: Possible themes may include learning theory to which the belief is aligned, literacy theory to which the belief is linked, and strategy implications based on this belief. Set up these themes using a Level 2 heading. Belief 3: (Insert Your Belief) Explain the details and implications of your belief. Use professional literature to form logical themes: Possible themes may include learning theory to which the belief is aligned, literacy theory to which the belief is linked, and strategy implications based on this belief. Set up these themes using a Level 2 heading. Belief 4: (Insert Your Belief) Explain the details and implications of your belief. Use professional literature to form logical themes: Possible themes may include learning theory to which the belief is aligned, literacy theory to which the belief is linked, and strategy implications based on this belief. Set up these themes using a Level 2 heading. Belief 5: (Insert Your Belief) Explain the details and implications of your belief. Use professional literature to form logical themes: Possible themes may include learning theory to which the belief is aligned, literacy theory to which the belief is linked, and strategy implications based on this belief. Set up these themes using a Level 2 heading Conclusions Regarding Your Philosophy Review the main conclusions and outcomes regarding your philosophy, learning theory, and literacy theory. Before you submit your assignment, grade your work with the following grading criteria. (Remove before submitting.) Criteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished Analyze selected learning theories in support of personal philosophy of literacy. 25% Does not analyze selected learning theories in support of personal philosophy of literacy. Identifies selected learning theories in support of personal philosophy of literacy. Analyzes selected learning theories in support of personal philosophy of literacy. Thoroughly analyzes selected learning theories in support of personal philosophy of literacy with support from professional literature. Analyze selected literacy theories that are logically connected to the identified learning theories that consistently support a literacy philosophy. 25% Does not address selected literacy theories that are logically connected to the identified learning theories that consistently support a literacy philosophy. Identifies selected literacy theories that are logically connected to the identified learning theories that consistently support a literacy philosophy. Analyzes selected literacy theories that are logically connected to the identified learning theories that consistently support a literacy philosophy. Justifies selected literacy theories that are logically connected to the identified learning theories that consistently support a literacy philosophy with professional literature. Apply learning and literacy theories in support of specific strategies that are consistent with the identified literacy theories. 25% Does not apply learning and literacy theories in support of specific strategies that are consistent with the identified literacy theories. Identifies learning and literacy theories in support of specific strategies that are consistent with the identified literacy theories. Applies learning and literacy theories in support of specific strategies that are consistent with the identified literacy theories. Justifies learning and literacy theories in support of specific strategies that are consistent with the identified literacy theories with professional literature. Write a literature review identifying appropriate themes based on analysis of literacy theory and best practice. 25% Does not write a literature review identifying appropriate themes based on analysis of literacy theory and best practice. Writes a literature review but does not include appropriate themes based on analysis of literacy theory and best practice. Writes a literature review identifying appropriate themes based on analysis of literacy theory and best practice. Writes a literature review identifying appropriate themes based on analysis of literacy theory and best practice and supported with a rationale for shaping one's beliefs.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!