Performance Factors Beyond EVM Discussion Essay
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Performance Factors Beyond EVM Discussion Essay
Business Discussion
1) DISCUSSION POST
Your Project Sponsor is not familiar with earned value management (EVM). You have been asked to provide him with a quick overview of EVM. Using the information covered in the readings, suggest the top three (3) EVM performance measures you would educate your Project Sponsor on. Also, identify other performance factors beyond EVM that you would communicate to your sponsor. Provide a rationale for your selection of topics
2) PEER REVIEW #1 (Jessica)
Hello Class,
Earned value management metrics refers to the metrics which companies and project managers apply to establish their projects’ earned value as they are getting carried out so that they can measure performance and eventually deliver on budget and on time. The entire EVM metrics are crucial since they combine to offer a more inclusive outline of project health than traditional accounting oriented measures which tend to track projects one-dimensionally, for instance, the amount spent vs. what got budgeted. In contrast to this, EVM metrics provide teams and project managers tighter and reliable controls over budget (cost) and time schedule (time) which implies better decisions may get made and projects may be better controlled.
The three critical and main EVM performance measures that I would educate my Project Sponsor on are planned value, earned value, and actual cost. Planned value (PV) gets calculated at the start of a project, and it is the total project budget or total planned value. For instance, in case a project budget to construct a house is $500,000, then the project’s total planned value is $500,000. Planned value tends to set the baseline the schedule performance, implying that if project managers stay on the trail with the planned value, they are on line to deliver on time.
Actual cost (AC) refers to the actual cost that gets sustained on a project so far. In case a project tends to have been running for four months and cost $100,000, then the actual costs (AC) are naturally $100,000. The other metric is earned value (EV). The metric allows project managers to view the amount of value or cost that has been generated or earned on the project or venture so far. For instance, a project that is 50% complete with a BAC (budget at completion) of $500,000 will have a $250,000 earned value.
The other performance factor beyond EVM that I would communicate to my sponsor is productivity. This measure looks at the general capabilities of an organization – how well it utilizes its resources. Besides, productivity demonstrates the relationship between outputs and inputs.
3) PEER REVIEW #2(Amber)
Hello Class – To get my project sponsor familiar with the earned value management (EMV), I would start with reviewing EMV and what it does. I will let them know EMV is a project management program developed by the American Department of Defense in the 1960’s. EMV uses metrics that measure performance of a project that helps with making needed corrective actions. Informing them that this program helps to control the time and cost of the project.
You should always have a full understanding of your projects time-line and the costs associated with what’s been done thus far and the costs for completing the project in full. I think the Planned Value (PV), Earned Value (EV), and Actual Costs (AC) are the top three metrics I would suggest to educate my project sponsor on. PV provides the baseline for tracking project performance in EMV. Planned Value = Planned Revenue. EV represents the revenue a project earns as work is performed and miles stones are achieved. Earned Value = Earned Revenue. And finally, AC is the retail value cost the project incurs as work is done. Actual Cost = Actual Effort.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!