Payroll system of the Sales Crop Company
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Payroll system of the Sales Crop Company
Draw Use case Diagrams and All levels of DFDs (context, 0, n) for the following Payroll system of the Salescrop Company:
Current SalesCorp Business Model/Process
SalesCorp facilitates door to door sales of other companies’ (vendors) products.
SalesCorp’s main job is to facilitate the following:
Recruitment of “Contractors” to sell other companies’ products
Payment of commissions to those contractors based on the sales they make/products they sell
Salescorp gets paid a set amount by vendors for all the sales that their contractors make. Salescorp keeps some of this as profit, and turns around and pays out the rest in commissions to their contractors
SalesCorp organizes contractors under “campaigns” for each vendor. A campaign can have multiple different contractors under it selling a vendor’s products
The contractors that SalesCorp recruits represent an independent business unit. These contractors will recruit “agents” that go door to door and make sales of the vendors’ products.
The sales that each agent makes are tracked by the vendor
SalesCorp pays the contractors commissions based on how many of each product their agents sell. Note that SalesCorp does not pay the agents period. They pay the contractors, and the contractors pay their own agents.
Contractors will have multiple “management” types that get commissions paid to them per product. So, if there’s Product A and Product B for a given campaign/vendor, Contractor A might have a “Recruiter” and a “VP” who both get paid different amounts of commission for Product A and Product B.
Every week, the vendor will send a spreadsheet of sales (called an invoice) to SalesCorp notating which agents sold which products that week. Since we only get data about the agents that made sales, SalesCorp needs to keep track of which agent is under which contractor, so that we can correctly attribute the sale’s commission to the right contractor. This sales data will identify the agent by their “Agent ID”.
We don’t need to keep track of any other agent data besides their “Agent ID”, first name, last name, and what contractor they’re under.
The sales data/invoice spreadsheet can be in a different format per campaign/vendor, and it needs to be able to be processed regardless of what format it’s in. However, each one is guaranteed to have some key information in it that we need – in particular the product that was sold, and the id of the agent that sold it.
SalesCorp deals with multiple campaigns/vendors at a time, and each campaign can sell many products, have many contractors under it, and those contractors may have dozens of agents under them.
Contractor’s commission rates are updated often – on a sometimes-weekly basis. The payroll specialists at SalesCorp keep track of and enter the commission rates. These people also handle setting up new campaigns, and importing sales/generating pay sheets each week.
Data entry specialists handle entering basic data for new contractors and agents that are onboarded – which happens constantly.
Each week when the sales data from vendors is sent in, SalesCorp needs to be able to process that data against their contractor’s commission rates and generate a “pay sheet” that details how much commission each contractor makes. That pay sheet should then be emailed out each week. A distinct pay sheet should go out to each person who makes commissions under a contractor. We’ll know a sale should be attributed to a contractor, because the agent Id from the sale will match one of the agents under them.
On the pay sheets, commissions are calculated for a sale one of three ways:
If a sale is payable, commission is paid at whatever the commission rate for the manager on the contractor is
If sale is not payable, commission is 0
If sale is a “chargeback”, commission is the commission rate of the manager on the contractor x -1 (a refund basically)
General Notes About How Process Should Work Within New System:
New system will be web based. The following assumes that we should be able to do all of these through web-based interfaces:
Set up campaigns for each vendor as needed
Set up contractors for each campaign
Set up the commission rates for each person within that contractor who will get paid commission by product
Set up agents associated with each contractor
For each campaign/vendor that is set up in the system:
Load in sales data/invoices each week for campaign, data should be automatically extracted from the sales spreadsheet regardless of format and be saved to the database
Generate pay sheets and have them emailed out to each person who makes commissions under each contractor.
It stands to reason that we’d want a way to be able to manage what users can use this system as well, that’s probably something someone in an “admin” role should do
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!