Organizational Behavior: From Theory To Application
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Score Total points: 100 points: 20% in Section I, 60% in Section II, and 20% in Section III
15 <?? I. Score: Summary of individual and workplace from All the Livelong Day (20 points)
12 pts ?? adequately describes person, role and setting, few writing errors
16 pts ?? good description and illustration person and issues, no writing errors
20 pts ?? eloquent description with concise, appropriate and good flow to writing
II. Application of concepts (3 concepts x 20 pts each, 60 pts total)
12 <?? i. Score
12 <?? ii. Score
10 <?? iii. Score
12 pts ?? used subheadings, selected appropriate concept, few writing errors
16 pts ?? above plus adequately defined and correctly cited concept, no writing errors
20 pts ?? above plus good application and improvement reasoning, with eloquent writing
18 <?? III. Score: Conclusions and Recommendations (20 points)
12 pts ?? used subheadings, summary of concepts, only minor writing errors
16 pts ?? above plus integration of concepts into a conclusion, no writing errors
20 pts ?? above plus good reasoning for recommendations with eloquent writing
0 <?? Deductions [section headers (?2), textbook citations and/or references (?4)]
67 <?? Total Score (out of 100) / Comments: The Ping?Pong factory was not one of the assigned
factories, so I know little about it or Cindy; your description is very short, and does not provide very
much detail. Concepts: job satisfaction ? appropriate, but not defined/cited (no need for more case
detail in analysis section); some reasonable ideas in application; but writing is not grammatically
correct and hard to follow. Motivation is an area, so I took your concept to be job design ? no
definition, would have been good to have found that in Robbins and Judge textbook; suggestions or
alternative work arrangements of flextime and telecommuting make no sense for factory work.
Work teams ? assignment is to use individual concept, teams are not an individual level concept.
Good effort on your summary and recommendations. Please have someone help you with your
writing; I can not give you a better grade in a writing intensive course without a reasonable level of
English language proficiency.Regarding your paper, before I accept a resubmission, I would need to know what you will do differently in this second attempt? It makes no sense to me to have you submit again without an understanding of what will be different. From what you submitted, it seems to me that you don’t hear the instructions that I provided over several classes, and did not read nor follow the instructions that I carefully wrote out with the assignment. Not having read the instructions is not a reason to resubmit, rather it is a lesson to learn. If you do not understand, it is important that you ask either me or someone in the class.
to tell my professor how he would change my original essay and how he will make my essay better
after that I would place another order tonight for the whole essay
now I only need 1 page outline
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!