open sources for reliability in evaluating biases
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The goal of this assignment is for you to examine your prejudices and critically analyze open sources for dependability. You will have to deliver the finest available intelligence analysis to the decision maker as an intelligence analyst or OSINT specialist. So choose your sources carefully and keep an open mind when you choose ONE of the themes listed below for your paper. The deadline for this four (4) to six (6) page paper is the end of week four. The title and references pages are not included in the page count.
1. Who exactly is “Anonymous”? Research the answer, assemble evidence to back up your claim, and offer your best guess as to who it is and why. You must only suggest one person and do not concentrate on more than one. In September 2018, the New York Times released an article entitled: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html. In November 2019, a book was released: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/trump-admin-targets-soon-to-be-published-insider-book-anonymous-n1076161 The investigation into who is Anonymous is still ongoing, and if you accept this job, you will be a part of it. https://youtu.be/rq3cBMleNiM
2. Describe and explain the controversy surrounding Hillary Clinton’s e-mails. Is the evidence pointing to a threat to national security or just to her campaign?
3. How much did the Trump campaign, transition team, and government coordinate with the Russians (see the definition)?
What effect did they have, and is America better prepared for future attacks from any foe now? To address this question, a detailed examination and application of Part I of The Mueller Report is required: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
4. Explain and describe the Uranium One Deal. What level of collusion did Hillary Clinton have with the Russians?
5. You are the OSINT Chief for the country X. The president is attempting to comprehend what was going on with the president, Giuliani, the “three amigos,” and all this quid pro quo thing with Ukraine in order to determine whether there is opportunity for exploitation in your country. Describe what transpired, how it affected international relations, and what risks the administration faces as a result.
Please have a look at the linked information literacy tools to see if they can help you with your research and writing.
Styles of Citation and Reference
In written work produced as part of the course’s coursework, students will use the Chicago Style as the exclusive citation and reference style. See http://www.apus.edu/Online-Library/tutorials/chicago.htm. The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th ed., is a good place to start. The Chicago Manual of Style is available online at http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html. It is suggested that you use the Author-Date system. https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/717/10/
All written entries should be typewritten in double-spaced format in Times New Roman 12pt font with 1” margins.
Grammar, use, and style problems are not permitted in college-level writing.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!