Online Aspects of Healthcare Case Study Discussion Response
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Online Aspects of Healthcare Case Study Discussion Response
Response Guidelines
STUDENT POST DOWN BELOW:(NYKEBA)
Investigated Issue:
Following a hospital stay, older women are experiencing the following problems:
Not having the capacity to cook meals
Perform routine household task
Care for other family members (e.g., older spouse) (Stringer 2013).
Context of Case Study:
Mackay has experienced a 12% increase in their elder population. Based off their 143,578 of permanent residents, 69,800 are females, and 11, 935 are over the age of 65. The area is serviced by three hospitals including Mackay Base Hospital, Mater Misericordia Hospital, and Pioneer Valley Private Hospital. There have been some concerns regarding the lack of human resources, a shortage of appropriately trained medical specialists, a need of community confidence in its services, declining workplace morale, and workplace bullying within Mackay Base Hospital (Springer 2013).
The Stakeholders:
The primary stakeholders include older women (Older Women’s Network) that have transitioned from a hospital stay to home, men and women from organizations, and friends and acquaintances of current primary stakeholders (Stinger 2013). Other stakeholders include hospital representatives, community services providers, and other community members (Stinger 2013).
How the Data was Gathered:
Participation in OWN meetings
Identification of approached participants
Data-gathering activities (e.g. Note taking, focus groups, artifacts)
How the Data was Analyzed:
“The data was analyzed according to the interpretive interactionist methodology of identifying and analyzing epiphanies and illuminative experiences” (Stringer 2013)
Ethical Issues:
“Maintaining ethical principles of MRCSD
Maintaining the confidentiality of interactions with participants, particularly with respect to any comments they provide about local services
Ensuring appropriate storage of confidential information at MRCSD
Obtaining permission from participants to share with others information they provide and how it will be shared (e.g., verbally in general references, in written brochures)” (Stringer 2013).
Outcome of Study:
Key issues have been identified. They have a plan of action of discovering and continual research of transitional improvements. They will keep OWN informed of progress.
Case Study Review
The issue investigated in the case study was the lack of effective substance abuse treatment for veterans living in Waco, Texas. According to the author, there was increased substance use among veterans in the region, although treatment services were lacking (Peterson, 2017). Therefore, the study context involved the veterans in central Texas who suffered from substance and alcohol use disorders. The research question for the case study was, “What are the unique substance abuse treatment considerations and challenges for military-based social workers living in central Texas” (Peterson, 2017)? The main stakeholders in this study were the substance abuse treatment administrators and veteran health advocates. These individuals were essential for the research since they helped identify the affected veterans and provide the necessary treatment. Similarly, the veterans with substance use disorders and their families were among the stakeholders in the study since they were the main participants who would receive the required interventions (Peterson, 2017). The social workers also helped in mobilization and community education during the project.
The author selected the participants for the study based on their availability and knowledge of substance use among the veterans. The author elected social workers based on their experience working with veterans with SUDs in central Texas (Peterson, 2017). The data from the veterans was collected using a semi-structured qualitative interview consisting of 7 items. Additionally, the author analyzed qualitative data by coding and identifying common themes present in the data.
The author did not report any ethical concerns since they sought informed consent from the participants. Moreover, the author kept all the information confidential and no harm as noted on the participants (Peterson, 2017). The study also received approval from the Institutional Review Board since it involved human participants (Peterson, 2017). Consequently, the study’s outcomes involved identifying factors that challenged substance abuse treatment among veterans in Waco, Texas. Thus, the findings provided recommendations for treatment strategies among veterans with substance and alcohol use disorders.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!