ONCAMPUS Assignment Brief Academic Year 2021-22
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
ONCAMPUS Assignment Brief Academic Year 2021-22
Please read this document carefully. It includes the learning outcomes, assignment task, information
about plagiarism and marking criteria. Please speak to your tutor if you have any questions.
Programme
Undergraduate Foundation Programme: Business
Module
UFPB3 – Skills for Business
Assessment title
Research Project
Deadline date
To be confirmed by your tutor
Weighting
This assessment counts for 60% of your overall grade for this module.
Pass mark
40% *please note your University may require a higher grade for progression.
Assignment summary
To write an individual report investigating the following:
The perception and experiences of international students when studying
in the UK.
Submission of work
http://www.turnitinuk.com
Feedback
http://www.turnitinuk.com
Feedback will also be communicated back to you via your tutor. They will
confirm the timescale in which you will receive your feedback.
Important details
Unless instructed otherwise by your tutor, please follow the below instructions:
Word count 1,500 words File type Word processed Font 12 pitch font – Arial or Times New Roman Format Double spaced and justified Referencing Harvard system Notes Your assignment must include page numbers and word count.
You will receive a 10% penalty for this assignment if you go over the word
count by more than 10%. If your assignment is significantly under the word count, you may not have answered the question in full and will be
reflected in your overall mark.
The word count does not include contents, end of text references or
appendices.
Page 2 of 8
Module learning outcomes: On successful completion of this assessment, you will have met the following module learning
outcomes: Knowledge based outcomes:
LO1. Collect, analyse and present relevant research and data to support a chosen project LO2. Present information effectively to meet audience needs
Skills based outcomes:
- Gathering data and information from a variety of secondary and sources • Communicating relevant information in a variety of forms • Analysing information and make reasoned judgements
Assessment criteria: In order to successfully complete this assessment and meet the above learning outcomes, you must
satisfy the following criteria:
AC1.1 Evidence relevant primary and secondary research carried out to support their work AC2.1 Produce a well-structured research paper with clear findings to support a chosen project AC3.1 Interpret and present the data using appropriate methods to inform others and support
own ideas
AC4.1 Demonstrate proficient use of Harvard-style referencing (subject to progression university)
Assignment instructions: To successfully complete this assignment, you must conduct a piece of research using a questionnaire
or interviews to investigate the perception and experiences of international students studying in the
- Your participants will be your classmates or other ONCAMPUS students.
Examples of the topics you might wish to investigate are:
- Homesickness • Life abroad • Work/life balance • Culture shock
These are just ideas – you can include anything you find of interest but please check the suitability
with your tutor first.
You will then write your findings as a research paper. The research paper is written in third person
formal English, such as you would find in a journal article. It will be treated as a scientific report,
therefore it must be factual, objective and logical in structure and content. You will be given more
information about how to structure your report later in this document. Task 1: Literature review and report introduction Part A: Literature review
- Decide what topic areas you might like to research. • Conduct a literature review to discover what previous research has taken place on your chosen
topic(s).
Page 3 of 8
Part B: Report introduction Write the introduction to your report.
Use the following guidance to help you:
- The introduction includes the literature review which is a description of the background literature related to the study. This provides the reader with some background information
relevant to your investigation.
- You should refer to at least 1 piece of previous research in this area. • Remember to use Harvard referencing in the body text when mentioning other studies.
Task 2: Research aim and designing a questionnaire or interview. Part A: Research Aim Write the aim of your investigation.
Use the following guidance to help you:
- Once you have completed Task 1, you will have an idea of what exactly you would like to investigate about students’ perceptions or experiences of education in the UK. This will
become the aim of the study.
- The aim of the study is a statement about what is being investigated and what is expected. Since this is not an experiment, there is no hypothesis; just a reason for doing the study.
- Your aim should be 1 or 2 sentences in length. Part B: Design a questionnaire or interview. Use the following guidance to help you:
- To investigate your aim further, you must devise a questionnaire or a set of interview questions to ask your fellow students about their perceptions and experiences.
- Consider what types of questions you will use, e.g., open or closed or a mixture of both. If you are using closed questioning, what form will this take, e.g., multiple choice, forced choice, or
Likert-type scale?
- Your questions must be chosen carefully to give you the answers you need that will meet the aim of your study.
Task 3: Conduct the research and Research Method
Part A: Conduct the research Before you actually conduct your research, there are some things that you must consider.
Use the following guidance to help you:
- Decide who your participants will be. E.g., will they be only your classmates, or will you use other OnCampus students or friends too?
- Decide how and when you will distribute your questionnaires and how you will collect them back in again. E.g., will you give them out during break time and collect them back in when you
return to class?
- If you are conducting interviews, you must schedule appointments with individuals. • Consider what type of sampling you are using, e.g., random sample, opportunity sample. • Remember to collect information about your participants such as age, gender if you think that
might be important based on previous research, country of origin, length of time studying in
the UK, existing level of qualifications, or any other relevant information. This information will
be needed when you write your Method section. Part B: Method Section
Page 4 of 8
This section is where you describe how you designed and carried out your investigation. Precision and
clarity are necessary in this section as this is where you demonstrate your understanding of
quantitative research methodology. This section is divided into 3 separate parts.
Use the following guidance to help you:
Participants • Give details of the number of participants together with details such as age, country of origin,
or the fact that all the participants were students. Include any characteristics of participants
that could be replicated, if someone else wanted to repeat this investigation.
Materials • This section is for the materials used for this investigation and can simply be listed with an
appendix reference for each one. (Example – Appendix 1: Informed consent form, Appendix 2:
Copy of interview questions. Procedure
- Carefully and accurately describe how the investigation was carried out. This should be done in a chronological step-by-step order. Enough details should be provided so that another
researcher could replicate the investigation.
- Include reference to any ethical issues that were addressed (for example when informed consent was carried out).
- Example: Participants were asked for their consent and gave it (Appendix 1). Questionnaires were handed out in class to participants. They were given 30 minutes to
complete the questionnaires before the researcher collected them in (Appendix 2).
Students were debriefed and advised that they could withdraw from participation in the
investigation at any time. Task 4: Results Present the results of your investigation.
Use the following guidance to help you:
- Collect the figures from your investigation, e.g., averages or percentages, etc. • Present the data in numerical and graphical forms, explaining briefly what the numbers are
saying (no conclusions here though!).
- Put the raw data into an Appendix at the end of the report. Task 5: Discussion Interpret your results in the light of previous research (you are comparing what is found in your
investigation to what was found in the studies you talked about in the introduction).
Use the following guidance to help you:
- Discuss the results of your investigation and how they link to the studies referred to in the introduction. Were your results similar or different to previous findings?
- The strengths and limitations of your research. • Any relevant modifications and areas of further investigation based on your results. Did you
have any problems when you carried out your study? Would you do anything differently if you
could do it again?
Important: Do not introduce any further studies in this section.
Page 5 of 8
Task 6: References, Report Abstract, and Appendices Part A: References References for all studies that appear in the introduction should be in standard Harvard format as you
have been instructed in your Skills lessons.
Part B: Report Abstract Write your abstract.
Use the following guidance to help you:
- The abstract contains a summary of important information about the study. It allows the reader to understand quickly how the study was carried out, the results and the conclusions
drawn.
- The abstract is the last section of the report to be written but appears at the beginning of your report.
- It should contain fewer than 200 words.
Part C Appendices Appendices (plural of appendix):
- Include copies of supplementary material, e.g., a copy of the questionnaire or interview questions, plus any other material you may have used as part of your investigation, such as
images or soundbites given to your students as part of the interview, etc. This section provides
all the materials necessary to allow a similar investigation to be replicated.
- Number them Appendix 1, Appendix 2, etc. Further information Once you have completed all of these tasks and received feedback from your tutor, you will need to
assemble your report for final submission. Make sure you assemble it in the following order:
Abstract
- Summary of aims • Summary of methods • Summary of results • Conclusion
Introduction
Method
- Method of data collection: interviews and/or questionnaires. • Participants: characteristics of target population. • Materials: list of materials used, reference to copies in appendices. • Procedures: itemised in sufficient detail to allow full replication.
Results • Descriptive statistics. • Graphical representation to show key data.
Discussion • Discussion of results. • Link results to studies mentioned in the literature review. • Identification of strengths and limitations of research.
Page 6 of 8
- Suggestions for modification and further research
References • Works cited within the report must follow Harvard style referencing.
Appendices • Copies of supplementary documents.
Plagiarism We expect all submitted work to be your own words (apart from in-text quotations), written in a style
that reflects your English language level. If you copy other people’s work and present it as your own,
this is called plagiarism and is a serious academic offence.
The full details of our policy on academic misconduct can be found at the back of the Programme
Handbook.
You must complete a coursework submission sheet and attach this to the front of your assignment. Submissions without this sheet may be rejected and may result in a mark of 0 being awarded for this assignment.
Marking criteria – Research Project Up to 60 marks are available for your Research Project as follows:
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!