oldest tool of inculcating discipline in children
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
oldest tool of inculcating discipline in children
For your final CLA, you will compile and revise again what you did for PA2 and submit a final draft of your paper.
You have to add one or two more paragraph for your essay with APA citation, credible source. Paragraphs should have at least 2 citation with elaboration and analysis.
Your conclusion should be 7-9 sentences ( fully analyzing your thesis, body paragraphs and significance of your topic
In addition to your paper, include a 750 to 800 word reflection on the entire essay writing process and different stages you followed to complete this paper. How does your intermediate draft compare and contrast with the first draft? What final changes have you made? How does your final draft compare and contrast with your intermediate draft? How have you improved the level of detail in the intermediate draft? How you have improved the structure of your paragraphs in this final version? Were you able to eliminate unnecessary words and sentences now that you have a better idea of what is expected of a writer?
PA2 BELOW:
Corporal punishment is the oldest tool of inculcating discipline in children. By many measures, the method has been effective in steering children to the right trajectory. Corporal punishment has come under serious attack by activists who universally condemn infliction of pain as a disciplinary tool. They have succeeded in persuading policy makers in many states into abolishing it. The corporal punishment debate has lost objectivity. Many people focus on one adverse consequence emanating from pain without considering the numerous benefits that it offers. This paper provides a rationale on why corporal punishment should continue to be employed in K-12 schools.
It saves learners valuable time as it is quickly administered (Kierra and George, 5). This in turn catapults them into focusing on their studies. Alternative disciplinary measures like suspensions or subjecting the learner to manual work are time wasting. Suspension force students to lose many academic days. This makes it difficult for them to catch up on their course work. Poor academic performance can be occasioned by suspension because learners spend considerable time at home. Personally, I support anything that is time efficient. Corporal punishment strikes an appropriate balance between the need to enforce discipline and apportioning adequate time to learners to actualize their dreams. Some learners rightly prefer it than suspension. They understand the implications of losing study time is not comparable to short lived pain.
A properly regulated corporal punishment is good for all stakeholders. It is fair to state that the bad stories that critics utilize to justify abolition are mainly caused by weak monitoring and leadership (Hans, 28). This causes some rogue actors to go overboard. Misuse of any practice deserves condemnation. However, this does not imply that corporal punishment should be banned in totality. I support regulations aimed at preventing misuse of corporal punishment. It is vital to recognize that alternative forms of punishment are not immune to misuse. They can be used to settle personal grievances with learners instead of their rightful disciplinary role. Corporal punishment should not be banned based on specific shortcoming that can easily be solved through regulation. Such actions will set a bad precedent that can be exploited to ban anything without experimenting on remedial actions.
Corporal punishment conforms to family and community practices. Some families are convinced that it achieves the overall goal of instantaneously stopping unwanted behavior compared to other alternatives (Hans, 33). It is also employed in homes. It sets clear demarcations among children on what is right or wrong. Children understand the consequences if they cross the line. It is not an overstatement that many parents have favorable opinion on corporal punishment compared to suspension. Suspension inconvenience the routines of guardians because they are supposed to accompany their children to school once they report. There is no enough justification to ban a disciplinary tool that is favored by parents. Parents have a great stake on the wellbeing of their children. They cannot approve something that is detrimental to their young ones.
Corporal punishment works. No other disciplinary measure serves the dual role of punishment and deterrent like corporal punishment (Kierra and George, 7). The sharp pain that accompanies it is a vital mechanism for reforming the behavior of a children. Moreover, it is immune from learners’ abuse. In some cases, learners can deliberately engage in some actions with an intention of being suspended to avoid classwork. A proper disciplinary mechanism should not have this kind of loopholes. Corporal punishment has been utilized to discipline generations of people who have turned out to be successful. The current generation of children should not be exceptional. The moral decay that characterizes the children of this century makes corporal punishment justifiable.
In conclusion, corporal punishment has been unfairly attacked by critics. The negative publicity that it attracts does not correspond to reality. It is vital to highlight that both sides of the debate are united by a singular objective of inculcating better behavior among learners. It is my considered view that this objective is unattainable if some options like corporal punishment are eliminated from the list. Teachers should be provided with an array of options ranging from corporal punishment and suspension to boost their efficiency in handling children. The world would be unsafe if children behavior is not properly checked.
Reference
Han, S. Corporal Punishment Practice: Law, Trends, Perspective, and Research. Corporal Punishment in Rural Schools. Springer, Singapore, 2017. 17-35.
Kierra, M. S. and George W. H. Examining the rationale for corporal punishment in schools. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 63 (2019): 1-8.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!