OL 328 Leadership Development Action Plan
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
OL 328 Leadership Development Action Plan
OL 328 Leadership Development Action Plan
In Module One, complete the first two columns in the table below. In the first column (Leadership Areas for Improvement), list three areas that that you would like to focus on in developing yourself as a leader (such as communication skills, time management, delegation skills, feedback skills, team-building, etc.). In the second column (Reason for the Chosen Areas), explain why you have chosen each of the areas.
In Modules Two through Six, you will create an outline of the components (at least three) from the Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership that will improve your chosen leadership areas.
Save a copy of this file to your computer so you can continue to make updates throughout the course. It is very important that you update this document every week. You will use the information you enter below to formulate an action plan for your final project.
Module One Module Two Module Three Module Four Module Five Module Six Leadership Areas for Improvement Reason for the Chosen Areas Model the Way Inspire a Shared Vision Challenge the Process Enable Others to Act Encourage the Heart Area 1: Interpersonal skills Why? These skills would help me relate with the workforce to ensure that their views and concerns are addressed. 1. Cooperation 2. Collaboration
3. Consultation
1. Create a vision that is considerate of everyone 2. Ask members to participate
3. Consider benefits for everyone
1. Foster innovation 2.Reward innovation
3. Allow for a creativity-enabling environment
1. Listen to everyone 2. Ask when something is not clear
3. Allow other to consult and express themselves
1. Encourage ideas 2. Foster creativity
3. Accommodate everyone
Area 2: Communication skills Why? These skills would help me listen to and communicate with members of the workforce. This would ensure that they are involved in and participate in decision making. 1. Timely communication 2. Full disclosure
3. Inviting ideas
1. Communicate the vision 2. Project the vision
3. Draw a plan to achieve the vision collaboratively
1. Communicate with technology 2. Include links across hierarchical levels
3. Create time to communicate
1. Accommodate communications 2. Listen and consider concerns
3. Let members consult with you
1. Communicate honestly 2. Listen to everyone
3. Give time to listen to ideas
Area 3: Delegation skills Why? These skills would ensure that, as a leader, I am able to delegate tasks and trust my subordinates to perform the tasks in an effective manner. 1. Managing expectations 2. Providing adequate information on tasks
3. Encouraging a can-do attitude.
1. Ask for contributions to the vision 2. Delegate vision achievement work
3. Trust the members to do what is needed to get to the vision
1. Delegate important tasks 2. Let members use their own methods
3. Consult and discuss tasks
1. Give adequate time for tasks 2. Enumerate task deliverables
3. Allow for adequate resources
1. Let members know they are trusted to perform 2. Let members ask for help
3. Help whenever possible
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!