objectives and intended outputs of portfolio management
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
objectives and intended outputs of portfolio management
Module 1-2: Case Study Overview
Objectives
This case study supplies an overview of the objectives and intended outputs of portfolio management and the reasons many firms utilize this approach in order to achieve their intended initiatives.
Specifically, regarding research and development firms, they craft their strategic plans in order to align to the firm’s overall target operating model, as well as the company’s overall mission; they are typically broken down into projects which are compiled into the main portfolio. In pharmaceutical firms, these goals typically include:
- Lowering drug expenses for the targeted client base
- Identifying opportunities in a given market to fill “gaps” where there is demand, but not supply (i.e.: new products, services, etc.)
- Increasing production in terms of efficiency, process improvement and upgrade research approaches.
In this case study specifically, the main goal is the first: lower costs. Therefore, the portfolio will ultimately be set up to achieve this intended objective. The other objectives will fall underneath as a sort of “umbrella.” That being the case, only projects which support this effort will be included in the firm’s portfolio, (Bode-Greuel, 2008).
Target Stakeholder Group
In this particular instance, the stakeholders would include the company’s client base. As the R&D firm’s main intent is to perform effectual research to develop new drugs which would support efforts to lower the firm’s overall drug costs, it stands to reason those purchasing the products and benefiting from the updated pricing would be the primary stakeholder group, (Bode-Greuel, 2008).
However, alongside the primary stakeholders will typically be other, indirect stakeholders. In this case study, examples would include partner companies who sell these products on behalf of the main company, and perhaps any adjoining supplier chain entities, as these companies would be also paying their own business costs and in that same vein, health insurance firms who cover all or part of the customer’s drug expenses would have a vested interest in this cost-reduction effort.
Taking this back to portfolio management, it would prove beneficial to these varying stakeholder groups as it will initiate an effort (or series of efforts), which will drive the pharmaceutical company’s investment in developing more price-friendly drugs. This portfolio of projects will all drive this output, but they won’t be approved by the sponsors until they demonstrate alignment to the corporate group’s overarching strategic goals.
The process which governs portfolio management will cover comprehension of diseases which will have many sub-segments. These would address overall disease comprehension and research, patient medical needs regarding the said disease, as well as other factors (like short vs long-term care) which will empower the firm to make an informed choice to invest in this venture or not, (2008).
In order to efficiently oversee a portfolio, the PM must closely monitor it through all phases of the lifecycle: initiation and planning to execution. Portfolios managed in a proficient manner will help secure the desired outputs, stay within scope and budget, within timetables set by leaders and obtain the ROI (return on investment) that is sought after by both internal and external stakeholders, as well as indirect stakeholders too.
These goals can be attained via any number of venues. They may include refining the process to be more efficient when creating new drugs. Also, upping productivity with the overall drug development process; focusing effort into crafting more streamlined research methods for new drugs and potential areas of interest which would benefit the firm’s operating model in multiple spaces, then highlight the ones that appear most promising. Key decision-makers and sponsors can leverage this information to call out the projects which appear to hold the most promise in terms of value, (2008).
Project, Portfolio & Program Levels
When a firm is rolling out a strategic initiative, it is typically broken down into three levels: project management, which are compiled into a program. The Programs in question are aligned to a Portfolio. Managers maintain direction and oversight at each level: project, portfolio, and program.
Project management is the leadership governance of a time-limited effort which includes a designated start and end period, along with a defined deliverable, which is a new product/service/etc. Well-vetted projects include a clearly defined output, including adequate descriptive details; also, there will usually be cross-functional leveraging and interdisciplinary partnerships (subject-matter-experts/SME’s). The project will have a defined schedule/timetable with an assumed consistent unrolling, a financial budget with constraints and a “safe margin” for unexpected costs. Finally, there will be a designated team, reserved tools, resources, and other assets, as well as leadership governance and reporting/fiscal updating expectations. Each project will include the in proposal how it aligns to the firm’s corporate approach.
Projects are grouped into Programs. Like projects, there are managers, but as each project is aligned to a similar Program, the program manager will have an oversight of several complimentary projects in-flight at one time. Using this approach helps to optimize the beneficial outputs of each project that may not be so assured if each were executed alone.
Lastly, Programs are compiled into Portfolios.
Corporate Strategy Alignment
The drive acting as an undercurrent for these projects (and the full portfolio) is adding value. The corporate strategy the firm has adopted is to lower costs, increase efficiency and streamline the process to lower overall company expenses whilst increasing production processes. The methodology selected to choose which projects will be compiled into the portfolio will also be utilized by the project teams to ensure continued alignment with the firm’s strategy and intended goals, also while remaining aligned to the expectations set forth by internal and external stakeholders.
Project Manager’s Role
For the PM, their role is to facilitate the project selection process, to ensure value is present in each project chosen, and that it demonstrates corporate alignment. Also, the PM will drive the project(s) in their lifecycle, ensuring continued alignment, adherence to budgets, forecasts, and other obligatory components to ensure a successful execution and close. The PM will also, in that same vein, continue to select and monitor the prioritization of each project and calibrate with leaders on any change management issues which arise on a given project. The PM will ensure the deliverables are crafted and the project closed in a compliant manner; also, that the outputs are still aligned to the R&D plan and operationalized (as needed), to meet the firm’s other overarching goals.
References
Bode-Greuel, K. M., Nichisch, K. J. (2008). Value-Driven Project in Portfolio Management in the
Pharmaceutical Industry: Drug Discovery Vs. Drug Development- Commonalities and
Differences in Portfolio Management Practice. Journal Of Commercial
Biotechnology, 14 (4), pp. 307-325. Retrieved from: Value-driven project and portfolio management in the pharmaceutical industry: Drug discovery versus drug development – Commonalities and differences in portfolio management practice – ProQuest
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!