Nurse’s Role in System’s Evaluation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Nurse’s Role in System’s Evaluation
RUBRIC:
Introduction: 10 pts
Exceptional
Introduces the topics of a nurse’s role in healthcare policy and system evaluation and the selected theoretical framework; applies these topics to professional practice. Thesis statement with a summary of what will be explored in the paper is provided.
Nurse’s Role in System’s Evaluation
30 pts
Exceptional
Provides information about the nurse’s role in system evaluation. Definition of system evaluation is clear. Discussion includes the complexity of change at the system level as well as 3 measures the nurse leader should take to empower change for positive outcomes. Reference to DNP Essential II including 3 roles of the Advanced Practice Nurse is made.
Nurse’s Role in HealthCare Policy
30 pts
Exceptional
Provides information about the nurse’s role in healthcare policy. Definition of healthcare policy is clear. Discussion includes the complexity of change at the policy level as well as 3 measures the nurse leader should take to empower change for positive outcomes. Reference to the DNP Essential V including 3 roles of the Advanced Practice Nurse is made.
Theoretical Framework
20 pts
Exceptional
Discussion includes a theoretical framework that may guide personal professional practice as a nurse leader in the capacity of system evaluation and healthcare policy. The theory is chosen from nursing or other appropriate discipline. Application of the theory to the role of a nurse leader in the capacity of system evaluation and healthcare policy is evident. Clear links are made.
Application to Professional Practice (This section is reflective and may be written in the first person.)
30 pts
Exceptional
A specific healthcare policy or system evaluation that is relevant to healthcare today is discussed and described in detail. Reflects on 3 ways to foster change and improve outcomes. Specific applications of theoretical framework and 3 roles of the DNP prepared nurse leader are explored. Applications are direct and relevant.
Conclusion.
10 pts
Exceptional
Conclusion is clear and concise. The purpose of the paper is clear. Major details are summarized with minor details left out. The most important components of the paper are summarized.
Clarity
15 pts
Exceptional
Writing is relevant to the topic and is presented logically and clearly using Standard English language. Direct course applications and synthesis of scholarly information is easily discernable. Word choice is correct, precise and unambiguous. Sentence structure is clear, concise and well-constructed. No grammatical or typographical errors.
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to prepare the DNP student for professional practice at the doctoral level. The student will explore the role of the nurse leader in the provision of leadership in system evaluation and healthcare policy. A theoretical framework will also be explored to guide this practice. ( DNP Essential II: 1–3; V: 2–6) Download DNP Essential II: 1–3; V: 2–6).
Course Outcomes
In completing this assignment, the student will:
- CO1: Appraise the role of the doctorally prepared nurse leader. (PO1)
- CO5: Appraise the role of the nurse leader in the provision of leadership in system evaluation and healthcare policy. (PO2 & 4)
- CO7: Promote patient/student safety through quality improvement measures supported by evidence. (PO4)
Due Date: September 25 by 2359 PT. (end of week 4)
Total Points Possible: 150
Requirements
- To complete this assignment, you will need to perform a literature search and utilize scholarly resources. Databases can be accessed through the Touro Online Library (Links to an external site.) . The Nursing Subject Guide (Links to an external site.) is a great starting point.
- The Roles and Responsibilities: System Evaluation and Healthcare Policy Paper is worth 150 points and will be graded using the designated rubric. Grading criteria include quality of content, appropriate citations, use of Standard English grammar, and overall organization and readability.
- Create your assignment using a Microsoft Word Application. The paper should be submitted in a .doc or .docx format.
- The paper should be 6–8 pages in length, excluding the title page and reference pages.
- APA 7th Edition format is required.
Paper Sections and Headers
The following sections should be included and denoted via APA section headings throughout the paper.
- Introduction
- The Nurse’s Role in System Evaluation
- The Nurse’s Role in Healthcare Policy
- Theoretical Framework
- Application to Professional Practice
- Conclusion
Preparing the Paper Content
- Review Albert et al. (2022). Chapters 2 & 7
- Nurses seeking a doctoral degree need to be aware of the complexity of the change process at both the policy level and the systems level.
- Review DNP Essentials II:1-3 and V:2-6. Consider the many roles that the nurse can play in the process of promoting change at these levels.
- Select three roles described in Essentials II and V that you believe could apply to your future practice. You will reflect on these roles in subsequent sections of the paper.
- Write an introduction to your paper. Introduce the three roles you will discuss, the theory you will utilize, and the specific system OR healthcare policy you will apply your findings to. Keep in mind that first person may only be used in the reflective sections of the paper.
- The Nurse’s Role in System Evaluation
- Search the literature for additional information that pertains to the nurse’s role in system evaluation.
- Synthesize this information, reflecting on your selected roles and DNP Essential II in the context of the topic discussion.
- Clearly define system evaluation and discuss the complexity of change at the system level.
- Discuss three measures the nurse leader should take to empower change for positive outcomes.
- The Nurse’s Role in Healthcare Policy
- Search the literature for additional information that pertains to the nurse’s role in healthcare policy.
- Synthesize this information, reflecting on your selected roles and DNP Essential V in the context of the topic discussion.
- Clearly define healthcare policy and discuss the complexity of change at the policy level.
- Discuss three measures the nurse leader should take to empower change for positive outcomes.
- Theoretical Framework
- Search the literature for a theoretical framework that could guide your practice as a nurse leader in the capacity of system evaluation and healthcare policy.
- Select a framework from nursing or other appropriate discipline.
- Apply the theoretical framework to the role as a nurse leader in the capacity of system evaluation and healthcare policy.
- Application to Professional Practice–this section is reflective and may be written in first person.
- Select a healthcare policy OR system evaluation that is relevant to healthcare today.
- Describe the policy or system in detail.
- Reflect on 3 ways you, as a future nurse leader, could foster change to improve outcomes by applying your selected theoretical framework and utilizing your selected 3 roles of a nurse leader.
- Summarize the role of the nurse leader in the provision of leadership in system evaluation and healthcare policy through a lens of theoretical application in the conclusion to your paper.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!