NR445 Principles of Ethics Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
NR445 Principles of Ethics Case Study
Topic Selection and Milestone
Topic Selection and Milestone
Winnie Nyamapfumba
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR445: Principles of Ethics
Professor Daniel Henke
November 15, 2021
Topic Selection and Milestone
Abortion is an issue that has precipitated numerous debates in society. It alludes to the act of terminating the life of an embryo developing in the uterus of a human being before it reaches maturity. Some individuals argue that keeping or eliminating a child should be left to the affected individuals. In contrast, others oppose the act claiming that it is an injustice to the young ones who are denied the chance to live (Tatalovich, 2019). Still, no conclusive decisions have been made on whether it is okay to have an abortion or whether it is an immoral act. This essay explores the debate on abortion to determine why individuals support each side of the discussion. It also scrutinizes the issue under different moral theories.
Evaluation of Different Sides of the Debate on Abortion
The supporters of abortion give different reasons for favoring the act. Firstly, those in favor of the action claim that pregnant women should be allowed to make decisions about their bodies. Therefore, if they choose to eliminate a pregnancy, they should be allowed to do so without being criticized (Tatalovich, 2019). Subsequently, supporters of the issue also claim that allowing the act promotes equality between males and females because it will enable women to have children when they have achieved their goals in life. When they get pregnant before they have fulfilled their dreams, they can eliminate their pregnancy and continue pursuing their goals until they reach them, just like male individuals.
Opposers of abortion have valid reasons for criticizing the act. Firstly, abortion takes away from the unborn babies their entitlement to live. It takes away the life of a living being, which is equal to murder (Tatalovich, 2019). Secondly, the opponents of abortion criticize the act because it negatively impacts the affected individuals’ health and well-being.
Firstly, those who abort their unborn children often develop a guilty conscience that predisposes them to mental distortions (Tatalovich, 2019). Subsequently, when the procedure is not performed effectively, the chances of developing conditions such as cancerous growths and infertility are significantly high.
Evaluation of the Position Using Moral Theories
Ethical egoists posit that the priority of individuals should be to focus on the things that interest them and not those that make other individuals happy. Ethical egoists would indicate that pregnant women should decide whether to have an abortion based on the decision that would benefit them the most (Popovski, 2018). Therefore, those who ascribe to this moral theory would support abortion. The justification of their moral position is that abortion lets women make pregnancy decisions that favor them the most. The moral viewpoint of the ethical egoist causes a significant conflict between the interests of individuals and those of the community. This is because allowing the act can precipitate immorality in society. It can cause young people to engage in unprotected sex without fear because they can eliminate the pregnancy seamlessly (Popovski, 2018). I believe that it is significant to use a different strategy to prevent unwanted pregnancy, such as educating young women on more practical ways of preventing unwanted pregnancies, such as using contraceptives.
Social contrast ethicists’ claim that those in the same community should follow stipulated moral and ethical values. The view of social contrast ethicists will be that women should not practice abortion because it contrasts the values and morals prescribed in society (Popovski, 2018). The fact that would justify the social contrast ethicists’ viewpoint is that abortion is taking away individuals’ lives, which can be perceived as murder.
Additionally, it would encourage immoral acts such as fornication and adultery because the repercussions of such actions can be eliminated seamlessly through abortion. The topic precipitates a collision between personal obligations and national ones because some nations have legalized abortions, making it okay for individuals in the region to engage in the act. However, those whose moral values do not agree with the actions may have difficulties following the stipulation. For example, physicians in the countries where abortion is legal are required to eliminate pregnancies without questions at patients’ request (Popovski, 2018). However, those in the medical profession whose moral values do not allow them to perform the act may have difficulties following the precept.
Professional Code of Ethics Relevant to Abortion
The ANA Code of Ethics contains several ethical principles that are relevant in the abortion debate. Firstly, the professionals are required to observe beneficence. Beneficence alludes to engaging in acts beneficial to the patients in their care (Fowler, 2017). The ethical principle would encourage doctors who support abortion to proceed with the action because it upholds the mother’s welfare. On the other hand, those who support abortion would use the principle to avoid it because it harms the unborn baby. Another significant ANA precept that is relevant to abortion is patient autonomy. The precept indicates that the patient is entitled to make critical decisions that affect their health. Therefore, pregnant women are allowed to decide whether they should keep pregnancies or eliminate them. Abortion may cause conflicts between professional duties and familial duties because the ethical code may obligate healthcare professionals to perform the act while members of the patients’ families are against it (Fowler, 2017). The professionals are obligated to prioritize their patient’s desires at the expense of the views of the family members.
Conclusion
Abortion is a controversial issue that precipitates unending debates in society. Just like those who support the act, those who criticize it have valid reasons for doing so. Therefore, it is significant to examine different perspectives about the issue, such as the viewpoints based on moral theories and those indicated by the professional code of ethics, to develop a better understanding of the issue.
References
Fowler, M. D. (2017). Faith and ethics, covenant, and code: The 2015 revision of the ANA Code of Ethics for Nurses with interpretive statements. Journal of Christian Nursing, 34(4), 216-224.
Tatalovich, R. (2019). Abortion: Prochoice Versus Prolife. In Social Regulatory Policy (pp. 177-209). Routledge.
Popovski, V. (2018). Ethics and laws of the future. In Future Courses of Human Societies (pp. 174-193). Routledge.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!