NoSQL Database Systems
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
NoSQL Database Systems
NoSQL databases are a new class of database management systems that are designed to handle large amounts of unstructured, semi-structured or structured data in a distributed manner. Unlike traditional SQL databases, NoSQL databases do not use a fixed schema and are designed to be horizontally scalable.
One of the primary motivations behind the development of NoSQL databases was the need for a more flexible and scalable solution for handling the growing amount of data generated by modern web and mobile applications. NoSQL databases are well-suited to handle this data because they can handle high levels of data ingestion, support flexible data structures, and are designed to be distributed across multiple nodes.
There are several different types of NoSQL databases, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Some of the most common types include:
Document databases: These databases store data as documents, which are similar to records in a traditional relational database. Each document can have its own unique structure and fields, making document databases well-suited for handling complex, hierarchical data. Examples of document databases include MongoDB and CouchDB.
Key-value databases: These databases store data as key-value pairs, where each key is associated with a value. Key-value databases are designed to be simple, fast, and scalable, making them well-suited for handling high-speed data ingestion. Examples of key-value databases include Redis and Riak.
Columnar databases: These databases store data in columns rather than rows, which can make them more efficient for handling large amounts of data. Columnar databases are typically used for handling large amounts of time-series data, such as stock market data or sensor data. Examples of columnar databases include Apache Cassandra and HBase.
Graph databases: These databases store data as nodes and edges, which represent objects and the relationships between them. Graph databases are designed to handle highly connected data, making them well-suited for handling social network data or recommendation systems. Examples of graph databases include Neo4j and OrientDB.
Each type of NoSQL database has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of which one to use depends on the specific requirements of a given application. For example, if an application needs to handle large amounts of complex, hierarchical data, a document database may be the best choice. On the other hand, if an application needs to handle high-speed data ingestion, a key-value database may be a better choice.
Another advantage of NoSQL databases is their scalability. Traditional relational databases can become a bottleneck as data grows, because they are designed to be run on a single machine. NoSQL databases, on the other hand, are designed to be distributed across multiple nodes, which makes them well-suited for handling large amounts of data.
However, there are also some disadvantages to using NoSQL databases. One of the biggest challenges is the lack of standardization among NoSQL databases, which can make it difficult to transfer data between different databases. Additionally, because NoSQL databases do not use a fixed schema, it can be more difficult to enforce data consistency and validate data integrity.
In conclusion, NoSQL databases are a new class of database management systems that are designed to handle large amounts of unstructured, semi-structured or structured data in a distributed manner. They offer several advantages over traditional relational databases, including scalability, flexibility, and performance. However, they also have some disadvantages, such as a lack of standardization and the difficulty of enforcing data consistency. The choice of which type of NoSQL database to use depends on the specific requirements of a given application.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
NoSQL Database Systems
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!