North American Archaeology (APY 333LEC)
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
North American Archaeology (APY 333LEC)
The scientific study of the past of humanity through tangible remnants is known as archaeology. The primary focus of North American archaeology is on the remains left behind by native Americans and the first nations of Canada. It is a broad field that incorporates elements of anthropology, history, geography, and geology. The history, practices, and philosophies of North American archaeology are covered in APY 333LEC. In-depth discussion of North American archaeology—including its history, theoretical frameworks, techniques, archaeological sites, contemporary problems and arguments, and prospective directions—will be covered in this article.
The Development of Archaeology in North America
There is a lengthy history of research into North American archaeology. European archaeologists first started exploring North American prehistoric sites in the 19th century, including the cliff dwellings of the Southwest and the Mississippi Valley mound-building societies. Early in the 20th century, academic archaeology departments and archaeological associations were founded in North America, marking the beginning of professional archaeology.
The use of radiocarbon dating, which enabled researchers to create more precise chronologies, and the emergence of processual archaeology in the 1960s, which placed an emphasis on scientific techniques and sought to explain cultural change through adaptive processes, are two significant advancements in North American archaeology.
Frameworks for Thought in North American Archaeology
Cultural evolutionism, historical particularism, processual archaeology, and post-processual archaeology are some of the theoretical frameworks that have impacted North American archaeology. According to the theory of cultural evolution, societies change with time, going from being simpler to being more complex. On the other hand, historical particularism emphasizes the distinctiveness of civilizations and opposes the idea of cultural change. Post-processual archaeology focuses on the social and political context of archaeological interpretation, whereas processual archaeology emphasizes the scientific approach and aims to explain cultural change through adaptive processes.
Archaeological Methods in North America
Archaeologists investigate the physical remnants of former human cultures using a range of techniques. These techniques include of surveying, digging, and analyzing. While excavation entails the methodical removal of soil and other materials from archaeological sites, survey involves finding and mapping out the locations of archaeological sites. In order to comprehend the activities and beliefs of earlier societies, analysis include the study of artifacts, traits, and other material remains.
Sites of Archaeology in North America
Numerous significant archeological sites can be found in North America, such as Mesa Verde, Chaco Canyon, and Cahokia. With a population of more than 20,000, Cahokia, which is close to St. Louis, was once the biggest metropolis in North America north of Mexico. The spectacular ruins of Chaco Canyon, which is in New Mexico, are home to the Great Houses and the well-known Chacoan roads. Chaco Canyon was a significant hub of Ancestral Puebloan culture. Impressive cliff homes and other Pueblo architectural marvels can be found in Mesa Verde, a region in southwest Colorado.
Debatable topics right now in North American archaeology
There are disagreements in North American archaeology. One topic that has received a lot of attention recently is repatriation. Numerous indigenous tribes have demanded the return of cultural objects and human remains that were removed from them without their permission. Another topic that has received attention recently is public archaeology, where archaeologists attempt to involve the public in their work and make it more approachable and applicable to contemporary culture. Last but not least, environmental archaeology is a young discipline that aims to comprehend the intricate connections that existed between ancient human cultures and the natural world.
Future Plans for Archaeology in North America
Looking ahead, North American archaeology is poised for a number of intriguing breakthroughs. Technology developments like DNA analysis and LiDAR scanning are opening up new avenues for studying the archaeological record. Working closely with indigenous tribes and other stakeholders is a key component of collaborative archaeology, which is becoming more and more significant. Interdisciplinary research, which combines ideas from several fields to tackle challenging problems, is likewise becoming more and more common.
Conclusion
As a whole, North American archaeology is a fascinating discipline that offers insight on the complicated and varied history of North America’s original populations. North American archaeology has a lot to contribute, from the earliest studies of European archaeologists to the development of professional archaeology, from the theoretical frameworks that direct archaeological interpretation to the techniques employed to investigate the archaeological record. We may anticipate fresh advancements and fascinating new discoveries that will further deepen our grasp of the past as we turn to the future.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!